期刊文献+

被保险人损害赔偿请求权的事先放弃之探讨 被引量:1

A Study of the Insured's Prior Abandonment of Damage Claim Rights
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在我国《保险法》第61条规定中,被保险人放弃损害赔偿请求权的时间限制在"保险事故发生后",但是在实际生活中,存在"保险事故发生前"放弃损害赔偿请求权的情形。"保险事故发生前"可分为订立保险合同前与订立保险合同后两个时间段。笔者首先从事先放弃损害赔偿请求权的情形着手,考虑损害赔偿请求权与代位求偿权的关系,结合债权转让原理,分析被保险人事先放弃损害赔偿请求权对保险人代位求偿权的影响。然后明确订立保险合同前与订立保险合同后,被保险人放弃损害赔偿请求权导致的保险人的权利义务不同。最后提出完善我国《保险法》第61条的具体意见。 The sixty-one article of Insurance Law in China stipulates that the limited Time for the Insured to claim a damage is after the occurrence of an insurance accident.But in real life,there always exists a situation where Insured abandons his claiming right in advance before an accident happens.Prior to the occurrence of an insurance accident,there are two time periods:after a insurance contract conclusion and before an insurance contract conclusion.This thesis,firstly works on different situations of prior abandonment of the Insured's damage claim rights with the transfer of creditor's rights principles and then makes an analysis of the impact caused by the Insured's prior abandonment of his damage claim rights on the Insurer's subrogation rights,which fully combines relations of the two rights.Accordingly,it comes to a conclusion that different time periods(after a insurance contract conclusion or before a insurance contract conclusion)of the Insured to give up his damage claim rights will have different impacts on the Insurer's rights.Finally,this paper aims to give some suggestions on the sixty-one article of Insurance Law in China on its own basis.
作者 周莎
机构地区 湘潭大学法学院
出处 《湖州师范学院学报》 2016年第9期106-110,共5页 Journal of Huzhou University
关键词 《保险法》第61条 事先放弃 损害赔偿请求权 代位求偿权 The sixty-one article of Insurance Law giving up in advance claim right subordination right
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献7

  • 1江朝国.保险法基本理论研究[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002:397.
  • 2Jerry Ⅱ , Robert H. Understanding Insurance Law. LexisNexis Group, 2002, p. p. 711 - 715.
  • 3Clarke, Malcolm A. The Law of Insurance Con- tracts, LLP Limited, 1997, 1997, p. p. 847, 848.
  • 4Baron, Roger M. A Pandora' s Box Awaiting Closure, 41 S. D. L. Rev. 237(1996).
  • 5.Burnand v. Rodocanachi[].App Cas.1882
  • 6.Blackbern、Re Miller,Gibb & Co Ltd[].WLR.1957
  • 7韩长印.不足额保险比例赔付的逻辑误区及其校正[J].法学,2008(11):98-106. 被引量:4

共引文献12

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部