摘要
目的探讨采用两种不同的根管治疗方法对牙体牙髓病患者的临床疗效。方法随机选取2012年6月—2014年8月收治的牙体牙髓病患者120例,随机分为实验组和对照组,实验组采用一次性根管治疗,对照组采用多次法根管治疗。并对其临床疗效、并发症等情况进行对比分析。结果实验组总有效率为93.3%,对照组总有效率为80%,实验组总有效率与对照组两组相比差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。实验组并发症发生率5%,对照组并发症发生率20%,实验组并发症发生率与对照组相比差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。实验组患者平均治疗时间与对照组相比差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对牙体牙髓病患者采用一次性根管治疗临床效果明显优于多次根管治疗,可缩短患者的治疗时间,减轻患者痛苦,且并发症较低,患者较易接受,具有较高临床价值。
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of two kinds of different root canal treatments for dental pulp disease.Methods A total of 120 cases of dental pulp disease patients admitted to our hospital between June 2012 and August 2014 were randomly divided into experimental group and control group. The experimental group adopted a one-time root canal therapy, while the control group received multiple-visit root canal therapy. Results The total effective rate was 93.3% in the experimental group and 80% in the control group, and the former was significantly higher than the latter, P <0.05.The incidence of complication was5% in experimental group and 20% in control group, and the former was significantly lower than the latter, P<0.05. The average treatment time of the experimental group was significantly shorter than that of the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion To multiple root canal therapy, one-time root canal therapy was superior in treating dental pulp disease because it can shorten the duration of treatment, alleviate patient's pain with less complication and high satisfaction.
出处
《中外医疗》
2015年第25期94-95,共2页
China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词
一次性根管治疗
多次法根管治疗
牙体牙髓病
One-time root canal treatment
Multiple-visit root canal treatment
Dental pulp disease
