摘要
目的分析研究乙肝血清学检验中的三种不常见现象。探究使用试剂的不同是否会对检测结果造成影响。方法随机选取2012年1月—2015年1月于该院进行血清学检验的200例乙肝患者作为研究对象。所有患者取3 m L静脉血作为检验样本,同一样本分别采取两种不同的ELISA试剂进行临床检验。分析检测结果,并统计不常见现象的发生几率。结果 A组检测结果显示共有10例患者出现三种乙肝血清检测不常见现象,B组检测结果显示共有9例患者出现三种乙肝血清检测不常见现象,采用统计学软件对比两种检测结果,结果差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。其中共10例患者出现不常见现象,占总病例数的5.0%。结论不同试剂并不会对乙肝血清学检测不常见现象的产生造成影响,对于乙肝血清学检验不常见现象,临床应结合患者的临床症状以及其他检测指标进行综合分析,并进行复查,排除可能造成干扰的一切因素,对于以此增加检测结果的准确性以及可靠性。
Objective Hepatitis B serology three of the unusual phenomenon. Explore the use of different reagents whether it will affect the test results. Methods Randomly selected in January 2012 to January 2015, January serological examination hospital 200 cases of hepatitis B patients as research subjects. All patients taking 3ml venous blood as the test sample, the same samples were taken to two different ELISA reagents for clinical testing. Analysis of the test results and, and statistical probability of the occurrence is not common. Results A set of test results showed that a total of 10 patients had three hepatitis B serological testing is not a common phenomenon, Group B test results showed that nine patients had three hepatitis B serological testing is not a common phenomenon. Using statistical software comparison of the two test results showed no significant difference in contrast showed no statistically significant(P>0.05) between the two groups. In which a total of 10 patients had unusual phenomenon, 5.0% of the total number of cases. Conclusion Different reagents will not have hepatitis B serology unusual phenomenon affecting, for hepatitis B serology is not a common phenomenon, should be combined with clinical symptoms and other clinical indicators detect a comprehensive analysis and review, rule out the possibility everything for interference, for in order to increase the accuracy and reliability of test results.
出处
《中外医疗》
2015年第27期173-174,共2页
China & Foreign Medical Treatment