期刊文献+

第二版超声BI-RADS分级与乳腺癌免疫组化指标研究

Study on the Second Edition of BI-RADS and Immunohistochemical Markers of Breast Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对第二版超声BI-RADS分级与乳腺癌免疫组化指标的研究。方法整群选取当地某医院2013年10月—2015年1月期间收集87例病理确诊乳腺癌的患者,使用免疫组化的相关方法并运用统计学原理观察。结果乳腺癌肿块内有毛刺组的ER、PR阳性表达率为86.0%(43/50)、84.0%(42/50)高于无毛刺组阳性表达率51.4%(19/37),48.6%(18/37)。两组进行对比,其差异有统计学意义(P=0.000 4和0.000 4,χ2=12.4661和12.4162)。有微钙化组的ER、PR阳性表达率54.5%(18/33)、51.5(17/33)%低于无微钙化组阳性表达率81.5%(44/54)、79.7%(43/54)。两组进行对比,其差异具有统计学意义(P=0.0011和0.0059,χ2=10.5333和7.5644)。结论第二版超声BI-RADS诊断乳腺癌的恶性征象与免疫组化五项指标(ER、PR、Ki-67、HER-2和P53)存在联系。 Objective To study the correlation between the second edition of BI-RADS grade and breast cancer immunohistochemistry index. Methods 87 patients with breast cancer were collected from October to 2015 2013, and the correlation was observed with immunohistochemistry. Results The positive expression rate of ER and PR in breast cancer was 86%(43/50) and 84%(42/50), 51.4%(19/37), 48.6%(18/37). The two groups were compared, the difference was statistically(P =0.0004 and 0.0004, and 12.4162 χ2=12.4661). The positive expression rate of ER and PR in the micro calcification group was 54.5%(18/33), 51.5(17/33), 81.5%(44/54) and 79.7%(43/54). The two groups were compared, the difference was statistically(P=0.0011 and 0.0059, and 7.5644 χ2=10.5333). Conclusion The second edition of BI-RADS in the diagnosis of breast cancer and the correlation between the malignant signs and the five indexes of immune system(PR, Ki-67, HER-2,P53 and ER).
出处 《中外医疗》 2015年第31期180-181,183,共3页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 乳腺癌 超声成像技术 免疫组化因子 Breast cancer Ultrasound imaging Immunohistochemistry
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献73

  • 1谷涛,傅庆诏,马喆,刘韶平,陶国伟,李海鹰,周炜.乳腺癌超声形态学表现与病理、分子生物学相关性研究[J].中国超声医学杂志,2005,21(7):503-505. 被引量:19
  • 2王永栋,田绍荣,张惠,刘赓年,李松年.彩色多普勒超声对诊断乳腺疾病的前瞻性研究[J].中华放射学杂志,1995,29(3):150-153. 被引量:14
  • 3梁凯,那丽莉,刘晓婷.二维超声及彩色多普勒对乳腺癌的诊断价值[J].中国实用外科杂志,2006,26(5):363-363. 被引量:11
  • 4支鹏飞.乳腺肿块的二维及彩色多普勒超声诊断分析[J].实用诊断与治疗杂志,2006,20(5):369-370. 被引量:9
  • 5[1]Nicholson RI, Hutcheson IR, Knowlden JM, et al. Nonendocrine pathways and endocrine resistance: Observations with antiestrogens and signal transduction inhibitors in combination. Clin Cancer Res, 2004, 10 (1 Pt 2) :346S
  • 6[2]Baselga J, Albanell J, Ruiz A, et al. Phase Ⅱ and tumor pharmacodynamic study of gefinitib (ZD1839) in patients with advanced breast cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol, 2003, 22(Abstr 24) :7
  • 7[3]Hutcheson IR, Knowlden JM, Madden TA, et al. Oestrogen receptor-mediated modulation of the EGFR/MAPK pathway in tamoxifen-resistant MCF - 7 cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat,2003, 81 (1) :81
  • 8[4]Knowlden JM, Hutcheson IR, Jones HE, et al. Elevated levels of epidermal growth factor receptor/c-erbB2 heterodimers mediate an autocrine growth regulatory pathway in tamoxifen-resistant MCF - 7 cells. Endocrinology, 2003, 144 (3) : 1032
  • 9[5]Shou J, Massarweh S, Osborne CK, et al. Mechanisms of tamoxifen resistance: Increased estrogen receptor-HER2/neu cross-talk in ER/HER2-positive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2004, 96 (12) :926
  • 10[6]Jones HE, Dutkowski CM, Barrow D, et al. New EGFR selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor reveals variable growth responses in prostate carcinoma cell lines PC-3 and DU- 145. Int J Cancer,1997, 71 (6) :1010

共引文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部