期刊文献+

语言图象还是语言游戏——从因果观念的汉语表现看维特根斯坦的语言哲学观

Theory of Picture or Theory of Language-Games——The analysis of Wittgenstein's intention of Linguistic philosophy through the representation of concept about cause and effect in the Chinese Language
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以汉语的因果观念的语言表现方式作为观察点 ,对西方当代语言哲学的代表人物维特根斯坦的前后语言哲学观的变化进行了一次检讨 ,认为前期维特根斯坦的语言图象论和后期维特根斯坦的语言游戏说在汉语实践中都能得到实证。维特根斯坦的哲学观念的转变表现出的是一种科学主义和人文主义的对立 ,但就具体的语言实践来看 ,语言图象和语言游戏既具有冲突性 。 In the perspective of the concept of cause and effect as a language representation in Chinese,the author examines the change in the linguistic philosophy of Wittgenstein about his early and later theories,who used to be a spokesman for modern Western linguistic philosophy.The author believes that Wittgenstein's early Theory of Picture and his later Theory of Language_Games are verifiable in language actions of Chinese.The change in his intention of philosophy represents the antagonism between scientism and humanism.At the same time,however,in the language actions,the Theory of Picture and the Theory of Larguage_Games take on the features of conflict and symbiosis as well.
作者 屈哨兵
出处 《广州大学学报(社会科学版)》 2002年第11期52-56,共5页 Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition
关键词 语言图象 语言游戏 维特根斯坦 因果观念 语言哲学 Theory of Picture Theory of Language_Games Wittgenstein concept about cause and effect linguistic philosophy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1沈家煊.语言的“主观性”和“主观化”[J].外语教学与研究,2001,33(4):268-275. 被引量:2303
  • 2齐良骥.康德的知识学[M]商务印书馆,2000.
  • 3涂纪亮.现代西方语言哲学比较研究[M]中国社会科学出版社,1996.
  • 4王维贤等.现代汉语复句新解[M]华东师范大学出版社,1994.
  • 5尚志英.寻找家园[M]人民出版社,1992.
  • 6邢福义.复句与关系词语[M]黑龙江人民出版社,1985.
  • 7[美]马尔康姆(N·Malcclm) 著,李步楼,贺绍甲.回忆维特根斯坦[M]商务印书馆,1984.
  • 8金岳霖.知识论[M]商务印书馆,1983.
  • 9吕叔湘.中国文法要略[M]商务印书馆,1956.

二级参考文献23

  • 1沈家煊.词义与认知——《从词源学到语用学》评介[J].外语教学与研究,1997,29(3):77-79. 被引量:42
  • 2沈家煊.R.W.Langacker的“认知语法”[J].当代语言学,1994(1):12-20. 被引量:177
  • 3Benveniste, E. 1971. Problems in General Linguistics [M]. Trans. M. E. Meek. Coral Gablres, FL: University of Miami Press.
  • 4Bright, W. 1992. Internatioanl Encyclopedia of Linguistics [M]. 4 vols. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
  • 5Carey, K. 1995. Subjectification and the development ofthe English perfect [A]. In Stein & Wright 1995.83-102.
  • 6Finegsn, E. 1995. Subjectivity and subjectivisation:an introduction [A]. In Stein & Wright 1995. 1-15.
  • 7Halliday, M. A. K. 1975. Learning How to Mean [M]. London: Edward Arnold.
  • 8Keller, R. 1995.The epistemic weil [A]. In Stein & Wright 1995. 16-30.
  • 9Kuno, S. 1987. Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy [M]. Chicago and London:The University of Chicago Press.
  • 10Langacker, R. W. 1987/1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar [M]. Vols. Ⅰ & Ⅱ.Stanford: Stanford University Press.

共引文献2302

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部