摘要
客观真实与法律真实在审判实践中的地位和作用是法学界长期研究的一个重要课题。然而 ,把法律真实和客观真实的任一方面作为案件审理的惟一依据都是失之偏颇的。因为 ,客观真实是源、是本质、是决定因素 ,法律真实是流、是现象、是被决定因素 ;客观真实是法官追寻的终极目标 ,而法律真实是法官追寻终极目标的桥梁。就此而言 ,在审判实践中我们既要反对只重视法律真实的证据化倾向 。
The functions and roles of objective truthfulness and legal truthfulness in trial practice have been a researching subject in the circles of law for a longtime. Objective truthfulness is the root, essence and determinant factor, while legal truthfulness is the branch, phenomena and factor that are determined. And objective truthfulness is the ultimate goal chased by judges, while legal truthfulness is the bridge to the goal. In trial practices, we should oppose the inclination of only attaching importance to legal truthfulness toward evidentiarization, and at the same time, we should also oppose the inclination of objectification of only attaching importance to objective truthfulness while overlooking legal truthfulness.
出处
《西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2003年第1期53-56,共4页
Journal of Southwest China Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)
基金
教育部"九五"课题"民事错案研究"的成果之一
课题批准号 99JD82 0 0 12。
关键词
客观真实
法律真实
审判实践
地位
作用
objective truthfulness
legal truthfulness
role
function