3Sepideh AH, Du X J, Zhao MD, et al. Use of quantitative magnetic resonance angiography to stratify stroke risk in symptomatic vertebrobasilar disease[ J]. Stroke ,2005,36( 1 ) : 140 - 143.
4Hendrikse J, Eikelboom BC, Grongd JVD, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography of collateral compensation in asymptomatic and svmptomatic internal artery stenosis [ J ]. J Vasc Surg,2002,36 (4) : 799 - 805.
5Remonda L,Senn P,Barth A, et al. Contrastenhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery;comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography[ J ]. AJNR,2002,23 (2) :213 - 219.
6Leiner T, Gerretsen S, Botnar R, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of atherosclerosis [ J ]. Eur Radiol, 2005,15 (6) :1087 - 1099.
7Corti R. Noninvasive imaging of atherosclerotic vessels by MRI for clinical assessment of the effectiveness of therapy [ J ]. Pharmacol Ther,2006,110 ( 1 ) :57 - 70.
8Desal H, Auffray Calvier E, Toulgoat F, et al. De Kersaint Gilly A. MR - angiography of the head and neck vessels: technical considerations and clinical indications[ J]. J Radiol,2005,86(9) :1117 -1123.
9Anzalone N, Scomazzoni F, Castellano R, et al. Carotid artery stenosis : intraindividuals correlations of 3 D time of flight MR angiography, contrast enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading [ J]. Radiology ,2005,236( 1 ) :204 - 213.
10Donald S, Patrick A, Richard F, et al. Contrastenhanced 3D MR DSA of the carotid artery bifurcation: Preliminary study of comparision with unenhanced 2Dand 3D timeofflight MR angiorraphy[J]. Radiology. 1998. 208:447-451.
