摘要
以哈耶克为代表的所谓进化自由主义者认为,社会科学领域存在着两种理性主义:一是进化理性主义,二是建构理性主义,前者是正确的,后者是错误的,马克思则被看做是建构理性主义的代表。实际上,马克思既不是建构理性主义者,也不是进化理性主义者,而是实践理性主义者,哈耶克针对建构理性主义者所做的批判,在很大程度上是对马克思的歪曲,马克思的实践理性主义从根本上超越了建构理性主义与进化理性主义的对立,为人类的理性寻找到了坚实的根基。
The evolutionary liberalists, such as Hayek, think that there lie two kinds of rationalism. One is evolutionary rationalism, which bases upon correct presupposition. The other is constructivist rationalism, which bases upon false presupposition. In Hayeks eyes Marxism belongs to the latter. In this thesis we criticize such dichotomy raised by Hayek. Hayeks criticism on constructivist rationalism is not applicable for Marxs theory. In fact Marx upholds neither constructivist rationalism, nor evolutionary rationalism. His position should be called practical rationalism, which surpasses the former two positions. On practical rationalism Marx finds stable foundations for human reason.
出处
《中国人民大学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2003年第1期90-96,共7页
Journal of Renmin University of China