期刊文献+

P300对闭合性颅脑外伤患者脑认知功能康复的评估价值 被引量:8

Evaluation value of P300 to rehabilitation of cognition function in patients with closed craniocerebral trauma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究P300对闭合性颅脑外伤患者脑认知功能康复的评估价值。方法应用Medicid-03E脑诱发电位仪测定91例闭合性颅脑外伤患者的视觉(图像)刺激诱发的异常P300波潜伏期(PL)和波幅(AMP),并对其进行比较分析,同时比较不同伤情、伤后不同时间患者的P300波。结果伤后不同时间P300波的PL和AMP差异有非常显著性意义(P<0.001);伤后不同伤情的患者不同时间的P300PL和AMP差异均有显著性意义,尤以原发性昏迷者为突出。结论P300波的变化可作为判断闭合性颅脑外伤患者脑认知功能康复的一项客观指标。 Objective To study the evaluation value of P300to rehabilitation of cognition function in patients with closed craniocerebral trauma.Method With medicid-03E brain evoked poten tial instrument,the latency and the amplitued of abnormal P300evoked by visual(image)stimulation were compared and analy zed between 91patients with closed c raniocerebral trauma and were compared with the P300during different condition of injur y and different time after injury.Results There was very remarkeble difference in latency and amplitude of P300between different time after in jury(P<0.001)and during different condition afte r injury,especially in patients wit h idiopathic coma (P<0.001).Conclusion The change of P300might be taken as an objective index of rehabilitation o f cognition function of brain in pati ents with closed craniocerebral trauma.
出处 《中国临床康复》 CSCD 2002年第24期3690-3691,共2页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation
关键词 颅脑外伤 P300 认知功能 craniocerebral trauma P300 cogni tion function
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献21

  • 1钟东,唐文渊,晏怡.神经电生理监测对药物治疗脑外伤的评价意义[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2001,10(14):52-53. 被引量:1
  • 2李晓璐,向利华,吴幼章.脑干听觉诱发电位对昏迷病人预后判断的研究[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2001,10(16). 被引量:1
  • 3田忠贵,方毅.急性轻中型闭合性脑损伤脑电地形图与CT分析[J].中华神经外科杂志,1996,12(3):195-195. 被引量:1
  • 4廖四照,杨文俊.被试者心理因素对事件相关电位测谎准确性的影响[J].临床脑电学杂志,1996,5(2):76-79. 被引量:7
  • 5[1]PAPANICOLAOU AC,LORING DW, EISENBERG HM,et al.Auditory brain stem evoked responses in comatose head-injured patients[J].Neurosurgery,1986,18( 1) :173-175.
  • 6[3]LINDSAY K,PASAOGLU A,HIRST D,et al.Somatosensory and auditory brain stem conduction after head injury:A comparison with clinical features in prediction of outcome[J].Neurosurgery,1990,26(2):278-281.
  • 7[4]CANT BR,HUME AL, JUDSON JA,et al.The assessment of severe head injury by short-latency somatosensory and brain-stem auditory evoked potentials[J]. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol,1986,65( 3) :188-195.
  • 8[6]SOUSTIEL JF,HAFNER H,Guiburd JN,et al.A physiological coma scale: grading of coma by combined use of brain-stem trigeminal and auditory evoked potentials and the Glasgow Coma Scale[J]. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol,1993,87( 4) :277-283.
  • 9[7]LINDSAY K,PASAOGLU A,HIRST D, et al. Somatosensory and auditory brain stem conduction after head injury:A comparison with clinical features in prediction of outcome[J].Neurosurgery,1990,26( 2) :278-285.
  • 10[10]ANTAI J, D' AMORE A,NEROZZI D,et al.An EEG analysis of drug effects after mild head injury in mice[J]. Life Sci, 1992,51( 3) :185-188.

共引文献9

同被引文献134

引证文献8

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部