期刊文献+

人肝脏劈离的解剖实验研究 被引量:1

The experimental study of human liver-split
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 比较劈离式肝移植两种主要劈离方式 ,即经典劈离方式和改良劈离方式的差异 ,以选择一种安全易行的技术。方法 将 58个甲醛固定的成人尸肝和 8个新鲜肝脏分别采用经典劈离方式和改良劈离方式进行分离 ,比较肝脏各段动脉、静脉及胆管的分布情况。结果  66个肝脏中 ,66 .7%的Ⅷ肝段、1 0 0 %的V肝段 (部分或全部 )通过肝中静脉回流 ;采用经典劈离方式的肝脏 ,其右半肝的第V、Ⅷ肝段静脉回流均被破坏。结论 改良劈离方式比经典劈离方式更安全可靠 。 Objective To select a safe and feasible way by comparing the two main styles of splitting liver transplantation classical splitting and modified splitting.Methods In order to compare the distribution of artery, vein and bile duct of all segments of liver, 58 formaldehyde fixed livers and 8 fresh livers were divided into two groups. One group was subjected to classical splitting and the other group to modified splitting. Results Among 66 livers, 66.7?% of the segment VIII and 100?% of the segment V (all or some) drained to middle hepatic vein. In classical splitting group, the vein drainage of 5th and 8th segments of right graft was destroyed.Conclusion Modified splitting is safer and more reliable than classical splitting, so the former is the first choice when the size of donor liver is suitable.
出处 《中华器官移植杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2003年第1期21-23,共3页 Chinese Journal of Organ Transplantation
基金 黑龙江省自然科学基金资助项目(D0 0 -0 1)
关键词 肝脏 劈离 解剖学 消化系统外科手术方法 肝移植 Liver Anatomy comparative Digestive system surgical procedures Liver transplantation
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

共引文献7

同被引文献33

  • 1陈知水,王海灏.中国肝癌肝移植的现状与展望[J].世界华人消化杂志,2006,14(10):939-941. 被引量:12
  • 2McDiarmid SV, Anand R, Martz K, Millis MJ, Maz- ariegos G. A multivariate analysis of pre-, peri-, and post-transplant factors affecting outcome after pediatric liver transplantation. Ann Surg 2011; 254: 145-154.
  • 3Karnsakul W, Intihar P, Konewko R, Roy A, Colom- bani PM, Lau H, Schwarz KB. Living donor liver transplantation in children: A single North Ameri- can center experience over two decades. Pediatr Transplant 2012; 16:486-495.
  • 4Emre S, Umman V, Cimsit B, Rosencrantz R. Cur- rent concepts in pediatric liver transplantation. Mt Sinai J Med 2012; 79:199-213.
  • 5Mallik M, Callaghan CJ, Hope M, Gibbs P, Davies S, Gimson AE, Griffiths WJ, Pettigrew GJ. Comparison of liver transplantation outcomes from adult split liver and circulatory death donors. Br J Surg 2012; 99:839-847.
  • 6Vagefi PA, Parekh J, Ascher NL, Roberts JP, Freise CE. Outcomes with split liver transplantation in 106 recipients: the University of California, San Fran- cisco, experience from 1993 to 2010. Arch Surg 2011; 146:1052-1059.
  • 7Lee WC, Lee CS, Soong RS, Lee CF, Wu TJ, Chou HS, Chan KM. Split liver transplantation in adults: preoperative estimation of the weight of right and left hemiliver grafts. Liver Transp12011; 17:93-94.
  • 8Nesher E, Island E, Tryphonopoulos P, Moon J, Nishida S, Selvaggi G, Tekin A, Levi DM, Tzakis A. Split liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 2011; 43:1736-1741.
  • 9Hong JC, Yersiz H, Busuttil RW. Where are we to- day in split liver transplantation? Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2011; 16:269-273.
  • 10Cescon M, Grazi GL, Ravaioli M, Ercolani G, Del Gaudio M, Vivarelli M, Cucchetti A, Zanello M, Vetrone G, Lauro A, Pinna AD. Conventional split liver transplantation for two adult recipients: a re- cent experience in a single European center. Trans- plantation 2009; 88:1117-1122.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部