期刊文献+

冠状血管病变特征对支架术后再狭窄的预测价值

Predictive value of clinical influence on angiographic in-stent restenosis after coronary stent placement
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 :探讨冠状血管病变特征对支架术后再狭窄的影响。方法 :冠状动脉造影 (CAG)随访支架术后患者共 110例 ,定量 (QCA)分析术前、术后即刻和随访时靶血管造影结果 ;比较支架术前靶血管及患者临床资料 ,应用单因素和多因素回归法分析术前靶血管解剖学和临床危险因素与再狭窄的相关性。结果 :再狭窄组中术前甘油三酯有增高趋势 ,但与无再狭窄组比较差异无显著性意义 (P >0 .0 5 )。单因素分析表明 ,再狭窄组血管术前狭窄程度、靶血管最小管腔直径和病变分型与无再狭窄组比较差异显著 (P <0 .0 5 ) ;多因素逐步回归分析表明 ,术前靶血管最小管腔直径和病变分型是再狭窄形成的独立危险因素 ,其OR值分别为 0 .12 0和 2 .6 4 2。结论 :冠状血管病变特征对支架术后再狭窄具重要预测价值。 Objective:To evaluate the predictive value of clinical influence on 6 month clinical and angiographic in stent restenosis after coronary stent placement.Methods:Patients who underwent successful coronary stenting were taken reangiography during 6 month follow up period. (Because larger part of patients in our study had recurrence of angina with less part of patients remained angina free, so we had much higher in stent restenosis than it actually had). Clinical (age, gender, coronary risk factors, serum levels of lipids and lipoprotein), quantitative angiographic (lesion localization, morphology, pre and postangioplastic minimal lumen diameter, reference diameter, and percent diameter stenosis), together with the clinical performance of unstable angina and its risk classification were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.Results:On the basis of preprocedual angiography, 110 patients with a total of 141 lesions received stent placement. At 6 months follow up, 67 patients ( 60.9 %) with 83 lesions ( 58.8 %) developed in stent restenosis as checked by coronary angiography. Multivariate analysis revealed minimal lumen diameter and AHA/ACC lesion type preprocedural to be independently associated with in stent restenosis during follow up periods. (OR: 0.120 and 2.642 ).Conclusion:Angiographic anatomy of coronary lesion preprocudural is associated with in stent restenosis, while minimal lumen diameter and AHA/ACC lesion type are two independently factors in evaluating the prognostic of stent placement.
出处 《临床心血管病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2003年第1期20-22,共3页 Journal of Clinical Cardiology
关键词 支架 再狭窄 冠状动脉疾病 危险因素 Stent Restenosis Coronary disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1[1]Fischman D L, Leon M D, Baim D S, et al. For the stent restenosis study investigators. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med, 1994, 331: 496-501.
  • 2[2]Till F V, Aliabadi D, Kinn J W, et al. Real life stenting: A comparison of target vessel revascularization in benestent-stress lesions to non benestent-stress lesions. Circulation, 1996, 94: I-332.
  • 3郭静萱,毛节明,郭丽君,张福春,李海燕,温尚煜,赵一鸣,陈明哲.冠状动脉内支架再狭窄的多因素回归分析[J].中华心血管病杂志,1998,26(6):423-425. 被引量:33
  • 4高润霖,陈纪林,杨跃进,乔树宾,徐波,姚民,秦学文,姚康宝,李贤,武阳丰.冠状动脉内支架植入术后再狭窄的危险因素和预测[J].中华心血管病杂志,2000,28(6):426-429. 被引量:25
  • 5[5]Hoffmann R, Mintz G S. Coronary in-stent restenosis predictors, treatment and prevention. Eur Heart J, 2000, 21:1739-1749.

二级参考文献2

共引文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部