期刊文献+

结构动力模型修正方法的比较研究及评估 被引量:48

COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF ANALYTICAL APPROACHES TO STRUCTURAL DYNAMIC MODEL CORRECTION*
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在实际工程中,由结构动力模型得到的计算值与通过试验获得的测量值间往往存在偏差,为了能够精确预测结构的动力响应,依据测量信息修正存在的动力模型是非常必要的.对现有几种有效的用于结构动力模型修正的理论方法(包括基于敏感性分析的矩阵型法、基于神经网络算法的参数型法和基于遗传优化算法的方法)做了详细的综述;介绍了这些方法的步骤和研究进展;并分析了这些动力模型修正方法在工程运用中存在的一些实际问题,如不完整的模态测量值、模型修正的鲁棒性、模型修正的计算效率和收敛性等.最后,通过对一实际的五层钢框架的动力模型修正,比较了这几种方法的优缺点,提出了今后需要解决的问题. Considerable discrepancies exist between predictions from a structural dynamic model and experimental results of a laboratory model or actual structure when the two are compared. Updating the existing dynamic model based on modal test data is very important in order to precisely predict actual behaviors of the structure via the structural dynamic model. This paper reviews the procedures for refining a structural dynamic model from modal test data by different approaches which are used effectively, including the modal sensitivity method, neural networks method and Genetic algorithm, together with the recent research advances in this field. Some problems of dynamic model correction encountered in the actual applications such as incomplete modal test data and robustness of correction, as well as the factors affecting the computational efficiency and solution convergence, are discussed. Merits and defects of these proposed methods are also discussed and some current problems needed to be solved in the future are pointed out by comparison of numerical results of a real 5-story-steel-frame model updating from limited modal test data.
出处 《力学进展》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2002年第4期513-525,共13页 Advances in Mechanics
基金 国家自然科学基金(59908003)资助项目
关键词 结构动力模型 动力模型修正 模态测量值 敏感性分析法 神经网络法 遗传算法 updating dynamic model, modal test data, modal sensitivity method, neural networks method, genetic algorithm, structural dynamic model
  • 相关文献

参考文献64

  • 1Bathe K J. Finite Element Procedures in Engineering Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffes,1982. 1~5
  • 2Friswell M I, Mottershead J E. Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics. Dordrecht, Boston: Klumer Academic Publishers, 1995. 1~6
  • 3Mottershead J E, Friswell M I. Model updating in structural dynamics: a survey. Journal of Sound & Vibration, 1993, 167(3): 347~375
  • 4Zhang Q W, Chang T Y P, Chang C C. Finite element model updating for the Kap Shui Mun cable-stayed bridge. Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, 2000, 6(4): 285~293
  • 5Oreta A W C, Tanabe T A. Element identification of member properties of framed structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 1994, 120(4): 1961~1976
  • 6Zimmerman D C, Widengren M. Correcting finite element modes using a symmetric eigenstructure assignment technique. AIAA J, 1990, 28(9): 1670~1676
  • 7Doebling S W, Farrar C R, Prime M B. A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods. The Shock and Vibration Digest, 1998, 30:91~305
  • 8Ahmadian H, Gladwell G M L, Ismall F. Finite element model identification using modal data. Journal of Sound & Vibration, 1994, 172(5): 657~669
  • 9向锦武,周传荣,张阿舟.基于建模误差位置识别的有限元模型修正方法[J].振动工程学报,1997,10(1):1-7. 被引量:16
  • 10李书,卓家寿,任青文.动力模型总体修正的近似解析解[J].力学与实践,1998,20(1):37-39. 被引量:6

二级参考文献28

  • 1公永建,张雨航,刘轶.新型奥氏体不锈钢Super304H焊接工艺评定[J].焊接技术,2013,42(9):44-46. 被引量:5
  • 2李书,冯太华,范绪箕.动力模型修正中逆特征值问题的数值解法[J].计算结构力学及其应用,1995,12(3):276-280. 被引量:5
  • 3袁亚湘 孙文瑜.最优化方法[M].北京:科学技术出版社,1997.559-569.
  • 4陈鹏程.大型集装箱装卸桥结构动态设计研究[M].上海:同济大学机械学院,2001..
  • 5孙凌玉 陈南.用优化方法实现大型复杂结构连接界面的模型修正[J].应用力学学报,1998,15:53-56.
  • 6骆剑,南京航空航天大学学报,1993年,24卷,1期
  • 7向锦武,博士学位论文,1993年
  • 8曾庆华,航空学报,1992年,13卷,1期
  • 9He J,AIAA J,1991年,29卷,5期
  • 10杨明,博士学位论文,1990年

共引文献234

同被引文献365

引证文献48

二级引证文献256

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部