期刊文献+

鉴别丁香假单胞菌丁香致病变种和豌豆致病变种的 DNA 探针的制备 被引量:1

Preparation of DNA Probes to Pseudomonas Syringae pv.syringae and P.syringae pv.Pisi
下载PDF
导出
摘要 把引起豌豆枯萎病的丁香假单胞菌丁香致病变种 Pseudomonas syringae pv.syringae 菌株3319和丁香假单胞菌豌豆致病变种 P.syringae pv.pisi 的模式菌株2452的染色体 DNA 分别用限制性核酸内切酶 HindⅢ完全消化,再用 T_4DNA 连接酶把消化好的 DNA 片段连接到用HindⅢ内切酶消化的质粒载体 pUC19上,然后把重组的质粒载体转化到大肠杆菌(E.coli RR1)中去克隆.把菌株3319和2452的 DNA 用 p^(32)标记做成探针,分别与克隆菌落杂交,筛选出只对菌株3319的 DNA 有特异性的1个重组 DNA 的克隆和对菌株2452的 DNA 有特异性的2个重组 DNA 克隆.再把这3个重组质粒 DNA 分别用 P^(32)标记做成探针,与菌株3319和2452的 DNA 杂交,也显示只对各自 DNA 来源的菌株具有特异性.这3个重组质粒中,有2个携带有菌株2452的 DNA 片段,1个为0.82 kb。另1个略小于0.58 kb,还有1个质粒携带有菌株3319的 DNA 片段,为0.85 kb. Plasmid vector pUC19 and chromosomal DNAs from strains,pseudomonas syringae pv.syringae 3319 and P.syringae pv.pisi,were seperately completely digested with restriction endonuclease Hind Ⅲ.The fragments were ligated with the digested vector using T_4 DNA ligase.The ligation products were transformed into E.coli RR1.Recombinants were probed with DNAs from P.syringae pv.syringae 3319 and P.syringae pv.pisi 2452.Two recombinants for P.syringae pv.pisi and one recombinant for P.syringae pv.syringae were obtained.The three recombinants were labelled and hybridized to the DNAs from P.syringae pv.syringae 3319 and P.syringae pv.pisi 2452.They were only specific to their homologous chromosonal DNA.The DNA fragments from P.syringae pv.pisi seperately were 0.82 kb and less 0.58 kb.The DNA fragment from P.ksyringae pv.syringae was about 0.85 kb.
出处 《福建农学院学报》 CSCD 1992年第1期37-40,共4页
关键词 豌豆 枯萎病 丁香假单胞菌 DNA DNA clone DNA hybridization
  • 相关文献

同被引文献19

  • 1李成云,李进斌,刘林,杨静,周晓罡.禾谷镰刀菌和稻瘟病菌基因组中的微卫星序列比较[J].植物保护学报,2005,32(3):251-255. 被引量:12
  • 2姬广海,方敦煌,殷端,李光西,杜绍明.香料烟细菌性斑点病病原鉴定[J].植物病理学报,2007,37(3):232-236. 被引量:11
  • 3GurArie R, Cohen C J, Eitan Y, et al. Simple sequence repeats in Escherichia coli: abundance, distribution, composition, and polymorphism [J].Genome Res, 2000, 10(1): 62-71.
  • 4Hirano S S, Upper C D. Population biology and epidemiology of Pseudomonas syringae[J].Annual Reviews in Phytopa- thology, 1990, 28: 155-177.
  • 5Malvick D K, Moore L W. Population dynamics and diversity of Pseudomonas syringae on maple and pear trees and associ- ated grasses [J].Phytopathology, 1988, 78 (10): 1366- 1370.
  • 6Clerc A, Manceau C, Nesme X. Comparison of randomly amplified polymorphic DNA with amplified fragment length polymorphism to assess genetic diversity and genetic related- ness within genospecies Ⅲ of Pseudomonas syringae [J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1998, 64(4): 1180-1187.
  • 7Scortichini M, Marchesi U, Dettori M T, et al. Genetic di- versity, presence of the syrB gene, host preference and viru- lence of Pseudomona syringae pv. syringae strains from woody and herbaceous host plants [J]. Plant Pathology, 2003, 52: 277-286.
  • 8Natalini E, Rossi M P, Barionovi D, et al. Genetic and path- ogenic diversity of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae iso- lates associated with bud necrosis and leaf spot of pear in a single orchard [J]. Journal of Plant Pathology, 2006, 88(2) 219-223.
  • 9Ivanovic Z, Zivkovic S, Starovic M, et al. Diversity among Pseudomonas syringae strains originating from fruit trees in Serbia [J].Archives of Biological Sciences, 2009, 61 (4) : 863-87O.
  • 10Dyer A T, Leonard K J. Contamination, error, and nonspe cific molecular tools[J].Phytopathology, 2000, 90(6): 565- 567.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部