期刊文献+

投服中心公益股东权的配置及制度建构——以“持股行权”为研究框架 被引量:21

Allocation and System Construction of the Shareholder’s Rights of ISC for Public Welfare——Study from the Framework of Shareholding and Implementing Shareholder’s Rights
原文传递
导出
摘要 投服中心是经中国证监会批准设立的,专门为保护投资者权益而普遍性持有上市公司股票并行使股东权利的公益机构。本文在阐述投服中心的持股特色及其公益股东角色定位的基础上,从投服中心持股行权的运作机制、现实样态以及域外经验探究公益股东权利配置的基本构造及内在机理,并提出有助于满足投服中心特殊股权配置需求的制度建构思路,以期为投服中心持股行权的合法性、正当性和适度性提供判断依据,也为进一步完善持股行权机制、推进我国资本市场投资者权益保护提供建议参考。
作者 陈洁 Chen Jie
出处 《投资者》 2018年第1期77-93,共17页 Investor
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献13

  • 1王轶.民法价值判断问题的实体性论证规则——以中国民法学的学术实践为背景[J].中国社会科学,2004(6):104-116. 被引量:397
  • 2Caspar Rose, A Critical Analysis of the ‘ One Share-one Vote ’ Controversy, 5 International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 126, 126(2008).
  • 3Shaun Martin & Frank Partnoy, Encumbered Shares,2005 University of Illinois Law Review 775,778 -781.
  • 4George W. Dent, Jr.,The Essential Unity of Shareholders and the Myth of Investor Short-Termism, 35 Delaware Journal of Corporate Law97,100-101 (2010).
  • 5Leo E. Strine, Jr.,Toward a True Corporate Republic : A Traditionalist Response to Bebchuks Solution for Improving Corporate America,119 Harvard Law Review 1759, 1765 (2006).
  • 6Shearman & Sterling LLP, Proportionality between Ownership and Control in EU Listed Companies: Comparative Legal Studyt ExternalStudy Commissioned by the European Commission, 2007, at 12.
  • 7David I. Walker, Evolving Executive Equity Compensation and the Limits of Optimal Contracting, 64 Vanderbilt L. Rev. 611, 611 - 674(2011).
  • 8James H. Irving, Wayne R. Landsman & Bradley P. Lindsey, The Valuation Differences between Stock Option and Restricted Stock Grantsfor US Firms, 38 Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 395,395 -412 (2011).
  • 9Martin & Partnoy, supra note 5 , at 778 -780.
  • 10Lawrence A. Hamennesh, The Policy Foundations of Delaware Corporate Law, 106 Columbia Law Review 1749, 1749 (2006).

共引文献23

二级引证文献235

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部