摘要
Objective To evaluate the clinical significance of antihypertensive effect with arterial compliance. Methods In males, 72 cases were control group, 35 cases were EH-controlled, and 35 cases were EH-uncontrolled groups. Blood pressure and arterial compliance (Cl and C2) were detected by HDI DO-2020. Results In the EH-uncontrolled group,the values of systolic blood pressure ( SBP ) , diastolic blood pressure (DBF) , mean arterial pressure (MAP ) , and pulse pressure (PP) were significantly higher than those of the control and the EH-controlled groups (P<0. 01) , however,there was no difference between the control and the EH-controlled groups. In the EH-uncon-trolled group,the values of Cl and C2 were lower than those of both the control and the EH-controlled groups (P<0. 01) ,again,wtih no difference between the control and the EH-controlled groups. Conclusion Arterial compliance (Cl and C2) measurements may serve as a sensitive indicator of evaluating antihypertensive effect.
Objective To evaluate the clinical significance of antihypertensive effect with arterial compliance. Methods In males, 72 cases were control group, 35 cases were EH-controlled, and 35 cases were EH-uncontrolled groups. Blood pressure and arterial compliance (Cl and C2) were detected by HDI DO-2020. Results In the EH-uncontrolled group,the values of systolic blood pressure ( SBP ) , diastolic blood pressure (DBF) , mean arterial pressure (MAP ) , and pulse pressure (PP) were significantly higher than those of the control and the EH-controlled groups (P<0. 01) , however,there was no difference between the control and the EH-controlled groups. In the EH-uncon-trolled group,the values of Cl and C2 were lower than those of both the control and the EH-controlled groups (P<0. 01) ,again,wtih no difference between the control and the EH-controlled groups. Conclusion Arterial compliance (Cl and C2) measurements may serve as a sensitive indicator of evaluating antihypertensive effect.
