期刊文献+

论法治社会私法的非优位性——对公、私法定位的再反思 被引量:10

On Non-priority of Private Law in Rule-of-law Society
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文通过对私法优位论进行追根溯源的探讨 ,发现它在价值理念、法律内容和法律形式等诸方面都存在着根本缺陷 ,是受近代市场经济和个人自由主义观的影响所产生的。在法治化进程中 ,私法优位与法治秩序所要求的权力制约、法律权威、司法正义、行政法治和人权保障都格格不入。本文在否定私法优位论的基础上 ,提出法治社会应当奉行公法优位的观念。 Tracing to its source, this article probes into the theory of priority of private law, finding that it has some basic defects in such aspects as the concept of value?contents of law?forms of law,etc, which have resulted from the influences of the market economy and individualism in recent times.In the process of the rulization of law, the theory of priority of private law is incompatible with power restriction?law authority?judicial justice?administrative rule of law and ensurance of human rights, which are demanded by rule of law society. On the basis of negating the theory of priority of private law,this article puts forward that rule of law society should pursue the theory of priority of public law.
机构地区 武汉大学法学院
出处 《华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2003年第1期41-46,共6页 Journal of Central China Normal University:Humanities and Social Sciences
关键词 法治 私法优位 公法优位 rule of law priority of private law priority of public law
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献18

  • 1崔建远.我国民法的漏洞及其补充[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,1995,35(1):1-8. 被引量:20
  • 2梁慧星.民法解释学[M]中国政法大学出版社,2000.
  • 3[法]勒内·达维德 著,漆竹生.当代主要法律体系[M]上海译文出版社,1984.
  • 4(美)伯纳德·施瓦茨(BernardSchwartz)著,王军等.美国法律史[M]中国政法大学出版社,1990.
  • 5(美)伯尔曼(Berman,HaroldJ.)著,梁治平.法律与宗教[M]三联书店,1991.
  • 6[美]约翰·亨利·梅利曼,.大陆法系[M]知识出版社,1984.
  • 7Lon L.Fuller.The Morality ofLaw. . 1969
  • 8Pound.Sources and Forms of Law. Note Dame Law . 1946
  • 9Vo Mehren.Book Review. Harvard Law Review . 1949
  • 10A.T.Von Mehren,J.R.Gordley.TheCivil Law System. . 1977

共引文献866

同被引文献157

二级引证文献49

;
使用帮助 返回顶部