摘要
目的 :对3厂家多潘立酮片进行质量比较。方法 :参照卫生部部颁标准和原研发厂标准设计试验 ,就溶出度、含量均匀度、含量、有关物质、泡包装密封性等进行测定。结果 :Y、W、L3厂家各3批/次产品含量分别为98 23 %~99 74 %、96 92 %~98 31 %、97 42 %~98 72 % ;含量均匀度A +1 80S分别为2 11~3 38、3 97~5 25、5 49~7 47 ,符合《中国药典》对小剂量制剂的限度要求 ;均未检出杂质R061668 ,杂质R052211的量分别为0 004 %~0 024 %、0 029 %~0 072 %、0 003 %~0 056 % ,总杂质量分别为0 030 %~0 095 %、0 102 %~0 128 %、0 232 %~0 489 % ;45min时的溶出度分别为95 09 %~95 77 %、91 25 %~96 43 %、95 48 %~96 58 % ;Y、W厂家的泡包装密封性在实验条件下无一渗漏 ,L厂家的漏板率在38 %以上。结论 :Y厂家的产品好于W ,更优于L。
OBJECTIVE:To compare the quality of domperidone tablets produced by 3 different factories METHODS:The quality of different products was investigated according to the standards of Ministry of Public Health and manufacture factories,including dissolubility,uniformity of dosage units,related substances and seals of blister packaging RESULTS:In 3 batches of products manufactured by Y,W and L,the contents of domperidone were 98 23%~99 74%,96 92%~98 31% and 97 42%~98 72%,and content uniformity A+1 8S was 2 11~3 38,3 97~5 25 and 5 49~7 47 respectively,which were in keeping with the Chinese pharmacopoeia;impurity R061668 was not found,and contents of impurity R052211 were 0 004%~0 024%,0 029%~0 072% and 0 003%~0 056%;the total impurity substances were 0 030%~0 095%,0 102%~0 128% and 0 232%~0 489%;the dissolubity(45min) was 95 09%~95 77%,91 25%~96 43% and 95 48%~96 58% respectively In experimental condition,no leakage was found from blister package of Y and W products,however,the leak rate of L product reached more than 38% CONCLUSION:According to this survey,the quality of product Y is the best,W is better
出处
《中国药房》
CAS
CSCD
2003年第2期113-115,共3页
China Pharmacy
关键词
多潘立酮
溶出度
含量均匀度
有关物质
密封性
domperidone
dissolubility
uniformity of dosage unit
related substance
seal of blister packaging