期刊文献+

The Role of Sciencein Codex Standards 被引量:2

The Role of Science in Codex Standards
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The key principle in the development of Codex standards is to ensure that the decision making process is based on sound science. The approval for the use of food additives and other chemicals in foods should be made only when adequate scientific data is available. The same principle applies to the development of maximum tolerable (or residue) levels for contaminants in foods. Using the General Standards for Contaminants and Toxins in Foods as an example, the following criteria are considered, when developing recommendations and standards: Toxicological information; Analytical data; Intake data; Fair trade considerations; Technological considerations; and Risk assessment and risk management considerations. The Codex Alimentarius Commission has repeatedly emphasized the use of risk analysis approach, in particular the use of risk assessment in conducting the safety evaluation of food additives, agricultural and veterinary chemicals and environmental and industrial contaminants in foods. In this respect, the well known efforts of the FAO/WHO Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) and the FAO/WHO Joint Meeting on Pesticide Residues (JMPR) provide the much needed information and recommendations for the risk assessment of specific chemicals. The risk assessment approach is also used in the safety evaluation of foods derived from modern biotechnology as well as in the quantitative assessment of microbiological risks in foods. The key principle in the development of Codex standards is to ensure that the decision making process is based on sound science. The approval for the use of food additives and other chemicals in foods should be made only when adequate scientific data is available. The same principle applies to the development of maximum tolerable (or residue) levels for contaminants in foods. Using the General Standards for Contaminants and Toxins in Foods as an example, the following criteria are considered, when developing recommendations and standards: Toxicological information; Analytical data; Intake data; Fair trade considerations; Technological considerations; and Risk assessment and risk management considerations. The Codex Alimentarius Commission has repeatedly emphasized the use of risk analysis approach, in particular the use of risk assessment in conducting the safety evaluation of food additives, agricultural and veterinary chemicals and environmental and industrial contaminants in foods. In this respect, the well known efforts of the FAO/WHO Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) and the FAO/WHO Joint Meeting on Pesticide Residues (JMPR) provide the much needed information and recommendations for the risk assessment of specific chemicals. The risk assessment approach is also used in the safety evaluation of foods derived from modern biotechnology as well as in the quantitative assessment of microbiological risks in foods.
出处 《Biomedical and Environmental Sciences》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2001年第1期145-148,共4页 生物医学与环境科学(英文版)
  • 相关文献

同被引文献14

  • 1白斌.浅谈我国食品添加剂[J].高等函授学报(自然科学版),2005,18(3):50-52. 被引量:3
  • 2陈瑶君.食品添加剂[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2006,18(1):93-95. 被引量:18
  • 3SCHRANKEL K R. Safety evaluation of food flavorings [ J ]. Toxicology, 2004, 198 ( 1-3 ) :203-211.
  • 4HALLAGAN J B, HALL R L. FEMA GRAS-A GRAS Assessment Program for flavor ingredients [ J ]. Regulat Toxieol Pharmacol, 1995, 21(3) : 422-430.
  • 5EFSA. EFSA-CEF-Food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids [ EB/OL]. [ 2009]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/EFSA/ScientificPanels/efsa _ locale-1178620753812 _ CEF. htm.
  • 6World Health Organization. Evaluation of food additives and contaminants[ R ]. Swittzerland: Sixty-eighth report of the joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, 2007: 57-158.
  • 7SMITH R L, COHEN S M, DOLL J. Criteria for the safety evaluation of flavoring substances The Expert Panel of the Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association [J]. Food Chem Toxicol, 2005, 43: 1141-1177.
  • 8中国香料香精化妆品工业协会,国际食用香料工业组织,国际生命科学学会中国办事处.第三届中国香料香精高层论坛,北京,2008-04-26-27[C].北京,2008.
  • 9IOFI. IOFI and codex alimentarius [ EB/OL]. [ 2009 ]. http:// www. iofi. org/Iofi/English/Home/Flavor-Safety/IOFI-and-Codex- Alimentarius -Commission/page. aspx/35.
  • 10Schrankel KR.Safety evaluation of food flavorings[J].Toxicology,2004,198(1-3):203-211

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部