期刊文献+

背负着欲望的理性思考——王船山对宋明儒学存理去欲观念的批判

The Reason Burdened with Desire --Wang Chuan-shan's Critique of the Differentiation between Principle and Desire in Neo-confucianism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 理欲之辨是中国哲学的一个核心论题。在王船山看来,宋明儒学的"存天理、去人欲"这个传统存在着不可克服的理论困境:1.从理性中彻底分离欲求的愿望只是人为设置的神话,因为其本身就包含着一种特殊的抽象使用理性的欲求。欲求与理性不可分割。2.感性活动本身并不妨碍存理的实践。当实践指向物欲的排除时,反而遮蔽了存理的实践。3.存理与去欲意味着两种不同的实践方式,通过去除欲求的方式并不能导致理性的开显。 The distinction between principle (reason) and desire is a basic problem in Song\|ming Neo\|Confucianism which is oriented toward sweeping all human desires in order to restore principle fully. But according to Wang Chuan\|shan, in it there are some difficulties which cannot be overcome: the intention of separating desire from principle is also a particular kind of desire, that is to say, principle and desire is unity; on the other hand, the desire toward things shades not the action of desire but that of reason, therefore the elimination of the desire cannot make principle present.
作者 陈赟
出处 《杭州师范学院学报(社会科学版)》 2002年第6期17-21,共5页 Journal of Hangzhou Teachers College(Humanities and Social Sciences)
关键词 理性与欲求 去欲与存理 王船山 物欲 principle and desire the desire toward things Wang Chuan-shan
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1黎靖德.朱子语类[M].北京:中华书局,1994..
  • 2朱熹.朱熹集[M].成都:四川教育出版社,1996..
  • 3王夫之.船山全书:第6册[M].长沙:岳麓书社,1996.
  • 4朱熹.四书章句集注[M].北京:中华书局,1996
  • 5王夫之.船山全书:第8册[M].长沙:岳麓书社,1996.
  • 6王夫之.船山全书:第1册[M].长沙:岳麓书社,1996.
  • 7程颢 程颐.二程集[M].北京:中华书局,1981..
  • 8王夫之.船山全书:第2册[M].长沙:岳麓书社,1996.
  • 9埃利希·诺伊曼.深度心理学与新道德[M].上海:东方出版社,1998,8..
  • 10王夫之.船山全书:第12册[M].长沙:岳麓书社,1996.

共引文献601

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部