期刊文献+

椎体压缩性骨折的磁共振诊断 被引量:9

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Benign and Malignant Vertebral Compression Fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析椎体良、恶性压缩性骨折的MRI表现。材料和方法:22例椎体良性压缩性骨折及49例病理性压缩性骨折患者,男43例,女28例,年龄34~76岁,平均58.3岁。全部行MR平扫+增强扫描。结果:压缩椎体的信号改变对骨折甚为敏感,但对良、恶性骨折的鉴别缺乏特异性。压缩椎体残留有正常的骨髓信号者多见于良性骨折(P<0.001)。压缩椎体后缘膨出、椎管狭窄常见于病理性骨折(P<0.001)。椎弓根受侵(P<0.001)及椎旁软组织肿块(P<0.001)是病理性骨折所特有的征象。增强后椎体信号均匀与否对诊断有帮助(P<0.001)。结论:病理性压缩性骨折多表现为椎弓根信号异常,椎体后缘明显膨隆,椎管狭窄,椎旁软组织肿块及增强后压缩椎体不均匀强化。椎弓根变形膨大一般不出现于良性骨折。 Purpose: To evaluate the magnetic resonance imaging characteristics that will allow differentiation of benign or malignant vertebral compression fractures. Materials and Methods: Twenty - two patients of atraumatic compression fractures and forty - nine patients of malignant compression fractures that had undergone magnetic resonance imaging were retrospectively reviewed.Conventional magnetic resonance imaging with T1 - and T2 - weighted gradient - echo MR images and gadolinium enhancement were obtained in all cases. Results:Decreased T1 - weighted and increased T2 - weighted signals are sensitive but not specific for tumor involvement. Normal marrow preservation of the compressed vertebral body are familiar in osteoporotic fractures to malignant fractures.posterior vertebral expansion(P < 0.001) are useful for differentiation of malignant from osteoporotic. Pedicle involvement (P < 0.001) or an associated soft tissue mass(P< 0.001) are specific for a tumor compression fracture. MR enhancement pattern(P < 0.001) help to establish a diagnosis.Conclusion: Malignant compression fractures tended to have an abnormal signal involvement of the pedicle , a marked and heterogeneous MR enhancement pattern, a tumor - like paravertebral soft tissue and a posterior vertebral expansion. Pedicle change with expansile lesion totally excluded a benign fracture.
出处 《中国医学计算机成像杂志》 CSCD 2003年第1期46-50,共5页 Chinese Computed Medical Imaging
关键词 椎体压缩性骨折 磁共振诊断 脊性 Spine Vertebrae Compression fracture MRI
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1[1]An HS, Andreshak TG, Nguyen C, et al. Can we distinguish between benign versus malignant compression fractures of the spine by magnetic resonance imaging?Spine 1995; 20: 1776~ 1782
  • 2[2]Rupp RE, Ebraheim NA, Coombs RJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging differentiation of compression spine fractures or vertebral lesions caused by osteoporosis or tumor. Spine 1995; 20:2499~ 2503
  • 3[3]Castillo M, Arbelaez A, Smith JK, et al. Diffusion - weighted MR imaging offers no advantage over routine noncontrast MR imaging in the detection of vertebral metastases. Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21: 948 ~ 953
  • 4[4]Baur A, Huber A, Ertl- Wagner B, et al. Diagnostic value of increased diffusion weighting of a steady - state free precession sequence for differentiating acute benign osteoporotic fractures from pathologic vertebral compression fractures. Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: 366 ~ 372
  • 5[5]Moulopoulos LA, Yoshimitsu K , Johnston DA , et al. MR prediction of benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 6:667 ~ 674
  • 6[6]Cuenod CA, Laredo JD, Chevret S, et al. Acute vertebral collapse due to osteoporosis or malignancy:appearance on unenhanced and gadolinium- enhanced MR images. Radiology 1996; 199:541 ~ 549
  • 7[7]Shih TT, Huang KM, Li YW, et al. Solitary vertebral collapse: distinction between benign and malignant causes using MR patterns. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 9: 635~ 642
  • 8[8]Lecouvet FE, Vande Berg BC, Maldague BE, et al. Vertebral compression fractures in multiple myeloma. Part I. Distribution and ppearance at MR imaging. Radiology 1997; 204: 195~ 199
  • 9[9]Kim HJ, Ryu KN, Choi WS, et al. Spinal involvement of hematopoietic malignancies and metastasis: differentiation using MR imaging. Clin Imaging 1999; 23:125 ~ 133

同被引文献58

引证文献9

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部