期刊文献+

鼻咽癌福州分期和UICC(1997)分期的对比研究

Comparing the Fuzhou Stage with UICC(1997) Stage of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探索鼻咽癌福州分期和UICC(1997)分期的相同点和不同点。方法:根据入院时病变情况按UICC及福州分期重新分期,对比观察254例放疗前有鼻咽CT检查的首程根治性放疗的鼻咽癌患者的生存率及病期分布情况。结果:1)两种分期的Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ期生存率相似,T、N分期生存率相似,差异均无显著性;2)病期分布情况:UICC分期中以Ⅱ期患者偏多,福州分期以Ⅲ期患者为主;N分期UICC以N1为主,福州分期以N2偏多;T分期两组主要在T3、T4上,差异有显著性。结论:两种分期生存率差异无显著性,分期差异主要在N1、N2上。 Objective To compare the survival rate and stage distribution of two stage systems of the nasopha-ryngeal carcinoma. Methods 254 patients who had CT scan before treatment were treated in our hospital. In order to compare the survival rate and stage distribution, all patients were re-staged according to the UICC (1997) stage system and Fuzhou stage system in the condition at in-patient lime. Results The survival rates were similar in Ⅰ , Ⅱ ,ⅢandⅣ stage of the two stage system. No significant differences were found in survival rate of T and N stage. All patients stage distribution: E stage patients were predominant in the UICC stage system and Ⅲ stage patients predominant in Fuzhou stage system. Conclusions No significant difference is found between the two stage systems. N1 and N2 are the main difference of the two stage systems.
出处 《肿瘤防治杂志》 2003年第1期74-76,共3页 China Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
关键词 鼻咽肿瘤 病理学 存活率 肿瘤分期 nasopharyngeal neoplasms/pathology survival rate neoplasm staging
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献20

  • 1Heng D M,Cancer,1999年,86卷,10期,1912页
  • 2Lee A W,Int J Cancer,1999年,84卷,2期,179页
  • 3Chua D T,Cancer,1996年,78卷,2期,202页
  • 4Min H,Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1994年,30卷,5期,1037页
  • 5Sham J S,AJNR Am J Neuroradiol,1991年,12卷,2期,265页
  • 6Teo P M,Cancer,1991年,67卷,2期,434页
  • 7Teo P M,Radiother Oncol,1991年,21卷,3期,11页
  • 8Ho J H C,Nasopharyngeal carcinoma:etiology and control.IARC Scientific Publications No 20 Lyon Int Agency for,1978年,99页
  • 9Heng D M K,Cancer,1999年,86卷,1912页
  • 10程志斌,中华放射肿瘤学杂志,1999年,8卷,69页

共引文献84

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部