期刊文献+

NPC与MPV方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效比较

Retrospective Comparison between NCP and MPV Protocls for Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :比较NPC与MPV方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌 (NSCLC)的疗效。方法 :6 4例晚期NSCLC患者采用NPC32例 ,采用Kaplan -Meier方法分析患者生存期。采用Cox比例风险模型分析影响预后的因素。结果 :MPV组中位生存期为 8个月 ,NPC组中位生存期 12个月。两组生存期差异有显著性 (P <0 0 0 5、 0 0 0 1)化疗的毒副反应主要是胃肠道反应和骨髓抑制。结论 :NPC比MPV能延长患者生存期 。 Objective:To compare the theapeutic effects between NCP and MPV protocols for advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC).Methods:Sixty-four patieuts havin advanced non-small cell lung cancer,the NPC and MPV Kaplan Meier meehods,were adopted to studdy 32 patients in eachs respectively for the survival rate and the cox regression prognostic factors.Results:The overall median two-years survival time in the MPV group was 8 months,and 12 months in the NPC group.The major toxic effects of the two groups were gastrointerstinal tract reactions and myelosuppression.Conclusion:NPC chemotherapy can prolong the survival time more in patients with advanced NSCLC than MPV chemotherapy but without increasing its toxicity.
出处 《华西医学》 CAS 2003年第1期9-10,共2页 West China Medical Journal
关键词 非小细胞肺癌 药物治疗 NPC方案 MPV方案 预后 Lung neoplasms/drug therapy Carcimoma,non-small cell/drug therapy NPC protocol MPV protocots Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1[1]Gralla RJ,Kris Mg.Chemotherapy in non small cell lung cancer,Results of recent trials[J].Semin Oncol 1988(suppl 4);15∶2-5.
  • 2[2]Gralla RJ Caspar Es,Elsen DP,et al.Cisplatin and vindesine combination chemotherapy for advanced carcinoma of the lung:A randomized trial investigating two dosage schedules[J].Ann Intern Med 1981;95∶414-420.
  • 3[3]Woodcock TM Blumenreich Ms,Richman SP.et al.Combination Chemotherapy with cis-diammine-dichloroplatinum and vinblastine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer[J].J Clin Oncol 1983;1∶247-250.
  • 4[4]Bonomi,PD,Finkelstein DM,Ruckdeschel JC,et al.Combination chemotherapy versus single agents followed by combination chemotherapy in stage Ⅳ non-small-cell lung cancer:A study of the Eastern cooperative Oncology Group[J].J Clin Oncol 1989;7∶1602-1613.
  • 5[5]Depierre A Lemarie E,Dabouis G et al.A phase Ⅱ study of navelbine in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer[J].Am J Clin Oncol 1991;14∶115-119.
  • 6[6]Grawford J,O'Rourke M,schiller JH,et al.Randomized trial of vinorelbine compared with fluorouracil plus leuxovorin in patients with stage Ⅳ non-small-cell lung caner[J].J Clin Oncol 1996;14∶2774-2784.
  • 7[7]Le Chevalier T,Brisgand D,Douillard J-Y et al.Randomized study of vinorelbine and cisplatin versus vindesine and cisplatin versus vinorelbine alone in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer,Results of a European multicenter trial including 612 patients[J].J Clin Oncol 1994;12∶360-367.
  • 8[8]Antoinele J W,John JC,Stanley PB,et al.Randomized trial comparing Cisplatin with Cisplatin plus.Vinorelbine in the treatment of advanced non smallcell lung cancer:A southwest Oncology Group Study[J].J Clin Oncol,1998;16(7)∶2459.
  • 9[9]Potier P History of the discovery of navelbine.In Pierre Fabre Oncologie,eds.Navecbine,Update and New Trends.Ist Edition,John Libbey Eurotrxt Ltd:France,1991.4.6.
  • 10[10]krikorian A pharmacokinetics of navelbine.In Pierre Fabine Oncologie,eds,Navelbine Updates and New Trends Ist Edilition John Libbey Eurotext Ltd:France,1991∶43-52.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部