摘要
通过司马光对晋初服丧期限的二次争论的评论的内容分析,揭示其政治思想上的保守性。并根据对司马光在《资治通鉴》书中的全部评论的观察,其关于历史事件评论的选择有严重倾向性,特别是普通百姓、妇女遭受残杀、迫害,均不予置评,揭示其史观的双重性和矛盾性。
This article is intended to expose the conservatism in Sima Guang's political views through analysis of his comments on the two disputes over the mourning for parents for 3 years in early Jin dynasty.Based on an analysis of all the comments in Sima Guang's History as A Mirror,this article shows that Sima Guang has a clear orientation in choosing a historical event for comments,as he makes no comments on the cruel killing and persecution of common people and women.It also exposes Sima Guang's double standard and paradox in his historical views.
出处
《井冈山大学学报(社会科学版)》
2007年第1期39-42,46,共5页
Journal of Jinggangshan University(Social Sciences)
关键词
司马光
《资治通鉴》
史观
双重性
矛盾性
sima guang
history as a mirror
historical views
double standards
paradox