大学生社会阶层、行为抑制/激活系统与调节定向的关系

The relationship among social class,behavioral inhibition/activation system and regulatory focus

目的:调查大学生的主客观社会阶层、行为抑制/激活系统和调节定向之间的关系。方法:运用主观的社会经济地位MacArthur量表(the MacArthur Scale of subjective SES)、客观社会经济地位(objective socioecnomic status,or objective SES)指标、行为抑制/激活系统量表(BIS/BAS Scale)、调节定向问卷(Regulatory Focus Questionnaire,RFQ)对某高校373名大学生进行调查。结果:①独生子比非独生子促进定向的得分要高(P<0.05),女性预防定向的得分显著高于男性预防定向的得分(P<0.01);②主观阶层与客观阶层、促进定向呈显著正相关(r=0.574,0.260;P<0.01),与行为抑制呈显著负相关(r=-0.195,P<0.01);客观阶层与促进定向、行为激活呈显著正相关(r=0.196,P<0.01;r=0.117,P<0.05);促进定向与行为激活呈显著正相关(r=0.153,P<0.01),与行为抑制呈显著负相关(r=-0.136,P<0.01);③行为激活-驱力(BAS-D),主观社会阶层,客观社会阶层正向预测促进定向;行为抑制系统(BIS),行为激活-愉悦追求(BAS-F)均负向预测促进定向;④行为激活的中介效应占客观社会阶层和促进定向关系的总效应的8%。结论:行为激活在客观社会阶层对促进定向的预测中起着部分中介的作用。

Objective:To explore the relationship among subject social class,objective social class,behavioral inhibition/activation system and regulatory focus among college students.Methods:A total of 373 subjects were surveyed with the MacArthur Scale of subjective SES,objective SES,BIS/BAS Scale and Regulatory Focus Questionnaire.Results:①The only child had higher promotion focus scores than multi-child(t=2.156,P<0.05).The women had higher prevention focus score than men(t=-4.273,P<0.01).②SSES was positively related to SES and promotion focus(r=0.574,0.260;P<0.01),SSES was negatively Correlated with behavioral inhibition(r=-0.195,P<0.01);SES was positively related to promotion focus and behavioral activation(r=0.196,0.117;P<0.05);Promotion focus had a remarkable positive correlation with behavioral activation and negative with behavioral inhibition(r=-0.136,P<0.01).③BAS-D,SSES and SES all predicted promotion focus significantly and positively.BIS and BAS-F both negatively predicted promotion focus.④The mediating effect of behavioral activation was 8% between objective social class and promotion focus of the total effect of the relationship.Conclusion:Behavioral activation has a partial mediating effect on the relationship between SES and promotion focus.