期刊文献+

基于整车风洞试验的MIRA车型数值计算 被引量:7

Aerodynamic calculation of MIRA model correlated with wind tunnel test
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了明确稳态数值计算对于整车气动力,特别是车身表面压力的预测能力,首先以全尺寸MIRA车型整车风洞试验数据为基准,进行网格方案研究并得出结论、车身面网格为10mm、5层边界层网格且第1层网格无量纲高度Y+=30可以满足网格无关性要求。然后,基于该网格方案进行数值计算后得到:无偏航工况下,阻力系数CD与试验值误差为0.34%,升力系数CL误差为1.06%;3°~20°偏航工况下,CD和侧向力系数CS误差分别不超过5%和9%,表明气动力计算准确性较高;车身表面254个测压点中,压力系数CP预测误差大于50%的测点个数基本不超过20%,其中误差较大的测点主要位于车身底部以及背风侧等流动较为复杂的区域。 The prediction capability of steady numerical simulation on aerodynamic forces and surface pressure of generic vehicles was clarified.First,a detailed study on mesh scheme for MIRA reference car model was carried out with baseline data derived from full-scale wind tunnel test.Results show that the gridindependent strategy requires 10 mm for car surface mesh,Y+=30 for the first layer grid and 5 layers around the car.Based on this mesh scheme,aerodynamic force calculation of MIRA model could yield satisfactory predictions,that at 0°yaw,the error of drag coefficient CDfrom test data was 0.34%,error of lift coefficient CL1.06%,and at 3°~20°yaw conditions,error of CDand side force coefficient CSwere respectively no more than 5%and 9%,which indicate the reliability of aerodynamic forces computation for simplified cars like MIRA model.For surface pressure,of all 254 pressure taps all over the car,error of CP over 50%are less than 20%,while surface pressure was poorly calculated mostly where flow is so complicated that separation or reattachment tends to happen,such as the underbody and the leeward side..
作者 周华 杨志刚 朱晖 ZHOU Hua;YANG Zhigang;ZHU Hui(Shanghai Automotive Wind Tunnel Center,Tongji University,Shanghai 201804,China;Shanghai Key Lab of Vehicle Aerodynamics and Vehicle Thermal Management Systems,Shanghai 201804,China;Beijing Research Center,Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China,Beijing 102200,China)
出处 《吉林大学学报(工学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第4期1043-1053,共11页 Journal of Jilin University:Engineering and Technology Edition
基金 上海市地面交通工具风洞专业技术服务平台项目(16DZ2290400) 上海市重点实验室项目(18DZ2273300)
关键词 车辆工程 气动力 表面压力 数值计算 MIRA车型 风洞试验 网格方案 偏航工况 vehicle engineering aerodynamic force surface pressure numerical simulation MIRA reference car model wind tunnel test mesh scheme yaw conditions
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献24

  • 1王夫亮,傅立敏.侧风对轿车气动特性影响的数值模拟研究[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2006,38(8):1255-1258. 被引量:17
  • 2傅立敏,刘锡国.典型汽车尾流结构的研究[J].汽车工程,1996,18(6):343-347. 被引量:20
  • 3谷正气,姜波,何忆斌,周伟.基于SST湍流模型的超车时汽车外流场变化的仿真分析[J].汽车工程,2007,29(6):494-496. 被引量:23
  • 4傅立敏.红旗CA774轿车尾流结构特性的研究.第四届全国工业及车船空气动力学学术会议论文集[M].武汉:中国空气动力学会风工程和工业空气动力学专业委员会,1997..
  • 5Alexis Scotto d'Apollonia, Stephane Contini. Large Eddy Simulation of a Semi Realistic Vehicle Shape Under Crosswind Conditions [ C ]. EACC 2007 3rd European Automotive CFD Conference, 2007:11 -24.
  • 6Bettle J, Holloway A G L, Venart J E S. A Computational Study of the Aerodynamic Forces Acting on a Tractor-trailer Vehicle on a Bridge in Cross-wind[ J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics ,2003,91:573 - 592.
  • 7Hucho Wolf-Heinrich. Aerodynamics of Road Vehicles [ M ]. America : Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc. , 1998.
  • 8Ramnefors M,Bensryd R, Perzon S. Accuracy of drag predictions on cars using CFD-effect of grid refinement and turbulence models[A]. SAE[C]. [s. l. ] :SAE,1996. ASE 960681.
  • 9Calkins D E,Chan W T. "Cdaero" A parametric aerodynamic drag prediction tool[ A].SAE[C]. [s.l. ] :SAE,1998. SAE 980398.
  • 10Menter F R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(8):1 598-1 605.

共引文献104

同被引文献49

引证文献7

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部