期刊文献+

商业保理资产证券化应收账款转让之法律问题与完善建议 被引量:2

Legal Problems and Suggestions on Transfer of Accounts Receivable in Commercial Factoring Asset Securitization
下载PDF
导出
摘要 资产证券化为商业保理公司的融资困境开辟了新出路。近年来,商业保理资产证券化业务发展迅猛,但目前尚处于法律真空地带,其核心环节——应收账款转让面临诸多法律问题:未来应收账款的可转让性、应收账款禁止转让特约的效力以及应收账款转让通知的主体和期限等。基于"提高商事交易效率、保护投资者利益、促进商业保理资产证券化业务健康发展"的考量,我国法律宜对商业保理资产证券化应收账款转让作如下规定:认可有基础法律关系的未来应收账款的可转让性;明确禁止转让特约对外部第三人(商业保理公司和SPV)无效;增加应收账款转让通知主体——商业保理公司和SPV,并有条件地承认暗保理"延迟通知"和未来应收账款"预先通知"的效力。 Asset securitization opens up a new way for the financing difficulties of commercial factoring companies.In recent years,the business of commercial factoring asset securitization has developed rapidly,but it is still in a legal vacuum.Its core link,the transfer of accounts receivable,is facing many legal problems:the transferability of future accounts receivable,the effectiveness of the special agreement prohibiting the transfer of accounts receivable,and the subject and duration of the notification of the transfer of accounts receivable.Based on the consideration of'improving the efficiency of commercial transactions,protecting the interests of investors and promoting the healthy development of commercial factoring asset securitization business',the following provisions should be made in our law:recognizing the transferability of future receivables with basic legal relationship;explicitly prohibiting the transfer of special agreements to external third parties(commercial factoring companies and SPV)Effectiveness;Increase the subject of receivables transfer notification-Commercial factoring company and SPV,and conditionally recognize the effect of covert factoring'delay notification'and future receivables'advance notification'.
作者 赵立立 王茜 ZHAO Lili;WANG Qian
机构地区 华东政法大学
出处 《吉林金融研究》 2019年第2期65-74,共10页 Journal of Jilin Financial Research
关键词 商业保理 资产证券化 应收账款转让 法律问题 完善建议 Commercial Factoring Asset Securitization Transfer of Accounts Receivable Legal Issues Suggestions for Improvement
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献35

  • 1黄斌.国际保理业务中应收账款债权让与的法律分析[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006,21(2):137-144. 被引量:20
  • 2申建平.论未来债权让与[J].求是学刊,2007,34(3):89-94. 被引量:10
  • 3[德]迪特尔·梅迪库斯.《德国债法总论》[M].法律出版社,2004年.第545页.
  • 4[德]海因·克茨 周忠海 李居迁 宫立云泽.《欧洲合同法》(上卷)[M].法律出版社,2001年版.第176页.
  • 5The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITBAL), United Nations Convention on the Assignment of Beceivables in International Trade, 2001.
  • 6郑玉波.《民法债编总论》.台湾三民书局股份有限公司1985年版,第467页.
  • 7The Commission on European Contract law, Principles of European contract law: part Ⅲ, ( Netherlands: Kluwer Law International,2003), p. 107.
  • 8郑玉波.《债权不得让与之特约与票据禁止转让之记载》,郑玉波.《民商法问题研究》(四),台湾三民书局股份有限公司1991年版,第105页.
  • 9[日]前田达明.《口述债权总论》(第3版),成文堂1993年版,第400页.
  • 10The International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (UNIDROIT), Principles of International Commercial Contracts, 2004.

共引文献46

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部