期刊文献+

“危险物品型”危险驾驶罪定界——抽象—具体危险犯价值与路径

The Limit of Dangerous Driving of Hazardous Material: the Discussion of Abstract-Specific Potential Damage Offense
原文传递
导出
摘要 《刑法修正案(九)》新增'危险物品型'危险驾驶罪,系抽象—具体危险犯。传统理论将危险犯划分为具体危险犯与抽象危险犯两类的做法有所遗漏,仅从形式上区分二者也存在疑问。抽象—具体危险犯在德日刑法中均有体现,要求在个案中考察行为的具体危险,但这种危险无需现实、紧迫。从罪刑均衡原则来看,'危险物品型'危险驾驶罪不是具体危险犯,将其界定为抽象—具体危险犯也符合'风险社会'下的要求。交通肇事罪、危险物品肇事罪均是危险驾驶罪的结果加重犯。 The Criminal Law Amendment(nine)increased dangerous driving of hazardous material,which is an abstract-specific potential damage offense.The division of abstract potential damage offense and specific potential damage offense in traditional theory has problems,which divides them literilly.Abstract-specific potential damage offense is an important concept in the theory of criminal law in Germany and Japan,which needs to consider the danger in specific cases,but not need to be pressing.In the angle of balance between crime and punishment,dangerous driving of hazardous material is not a specific potential damage offense,the classification of abstract-specific potential damage offense accords to the needs of risk society.traffic accident crime and The crime of dangerous goods are the aggravated offence of abstract-specific potential damage offense.
作者 陈文昊 Chen Wenhao
机构地区 北京大学法学院
出处 《京师法律评论》 2016年第1期419-430,共12页
关键词 “危险物品型”危险驾驶罪 抽象—具体危险犯 风险社会 罪刑均衡 结果加重犯 dangerous driving of hazardous material abstract-specific potential damage offense risk society balance between crime and punishment aggravated offence
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部