战伤分类信息比较研究

A comparative study of combat casualty classification information

目的比较典型战伤分类研究与应用的共识和差异。方法采用文献研究的方法,通过直接与间接相结合的方式呈现战伤分类信息要素。基于统一标准,分两个层次对这些要素进行比较分析。结果得到共识程度较高的3种一级战伤分类信息要素以及6种伤型、10种伤因、5种并发症信息要素,确定关于伤部划分的4点主流共识。结论研究结果为我军进一步科学制定既符合实际又顺应趋势的战伤分类信息标识体系提供了参考和依据。

Objective To compare the consensuses and discrepancies regarding typical research and application of combat casualty classification. Methods Information elements of combat casualty classification were presented both directly and indirectly with literature research. Then,comparative analysis of these elements was carried out at two levels based on the unified standard. Results Three types of information elements of combat casualty classification at the first level,six types of information elements of types of injuries,ten types of information elements of causes of injury,and five types of information elements of complications were obtained with high degrees of consensus. And four types of mainstream consensus of classification of locations of injuries were identified. Conclusion The findings provide important evidence for our troops to construct the information coding system of combat casualty classification.