期刊文献+

社区高血压患者分层分组管理效果评价 被引量:1

Effect Evaluation on the Layering and Grouping Management of Hypertension Patients in Community
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨社区高血压患者分层分组管理的效果,以完善社区高血压管理方式,提高社区高血压管理的有效性。方法采用随机抽样的方法,选择189名高血压患者作为研究对象,进行基线调查,然后开展为期1年的分组管理,并对完成评估的178名患者的管理效果进行评价。结果管理1年后,低危层患者明显增加,中、高危层患者明显减少(P<0.01);中等水平运动者显著增多,低水平运动者显著减少(P<0.01);全家每月的盐食用量明显降低(P<0.01);管理对象的血压控制率从管理前的41.6%升高到管理后的65.2%;管理对象的甘油三酯(TG)、高密度脂蛋白(HDL-C)、低密度脂蛋白(LDL-C)三项血脂的达标率也明显升高(P<0.01)。结论社区高血压分层分组管理是有效的,应继续加强和完善社区高血压的分层分组管理。 Objective To explore the effect of layering and grouping management for hypertension patients. Methods The baseline survey was been carried out among 189 hypertension patients who were randomly selected as subjects. After received hypertension layering and grouping management for one year, the assessment was been conducted to analyze the management effects of 178 patients who completed 1-year management. Results After 1-year management, more patients became low cardiovascular risk patients and high cardiovascular risk patients were less(P<0.01). More patients had moderate level movement and patients with low level movement became less(P<0.01). The average monthly intake of family salt significantly decreased(P<0.01). The control rate of blood pressure rose from 41.6% to 65.2%. The goal-achievement rate of triglyceride(TG), low-density lipoprotein(LDL) and high density lipoprotein(HDL) increased significantly(P<0.01). Conclusion The hypertension grouping management is efficient though further improvement is needed.
出处 《健康教育与健康促进》 2014年第2期100-102,共3页 Health Education and Health Promotion
关键词 高血压 分组管理 效果评价 Hypertension Grouping management Evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献44

  • 1傅东波,沈贻谔,傅华,戴俊明,李洋,吴翠娥,丁永明,卫志华,杨明健.高血压自我管理方法(高血压俱乐部)初探[J].上海预防医学,2000,12(12):555-556. 被引量:42
  • 2李可基,张宝慧.国际组织和各国政府关于运动促进健康政策及措施的分析与比较[J].体育科学,2003,23(1):91-95. 被引量:37
  • 3全国血压抽样调查协作组.中国人群高血压患病率及其变化趋势[J].高血压杂志,1995,3(A01):7-13. 被引量:508
  • 4李世绰 王文志 等.社区综合性预防对脑卒中发病率和死亡率的影响[J].中华预防医学杂志,1998,32:8-11.
  • 5Fortmann SP, Flora JA, Winkleby MA, et al. Community intervention trials: reflections on the Stanford Five - city Project experience[J]. Am J Epidemiol, 1995, 142 : 576 - 586.
  • 6Puska P, Tuonilehto J, Nissinen A, et al. Ten years of the North Karelia Project[J]. Aeta Med Seand, 1985(Suppl), 701:66-71.
  • 7Booth ML, Owen N, Bauman AE, et al. Retest reliability of recall measures of leisure-time physical activity in Australian adults. Int J Epidemiol,1996,25∶153-159.
  • 8Bassett DR. Validity and reliability issues in objective monitoring of physical activity.Res Q Exerc Sport,2000,71(suppl)∶s30-s36.
  • 9Jacobs DR, Ainsworth BE, Hartman TJ, et al. A simultaneous evaluation of 10 commonly used physical activity questionnaires. Med Sci Sports Exerc,1993,25∶81-91.
  • 10Sobngwi E, Mbanya JC, Unwin NC, et al. Development and validation of a questionnaire for the assessment of physical activity in epidemiological studies in Sub-Saharal Africa.Int J Epidemiol,2001,30∶1361-1368.

共引文献1003

同被引文献34

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部