也谈《刑法修正案(八)》中一个顿号的问题——兼与刘叶同志商榷

On a Comma in "Criminal Law Amendment(Eight)"——Discussion with Comrade Liu Ye

《刑法修正案(八)》从法律层面将扒窃"入刑",有效拓展了对盗窃罪的打击范围和力度。但对于第三十九条增加三种盗窃罪情形,即"入户盗窃、携带凶器盗窃、扒窃的"中间这个顿号含义的理解歧意造成司法实践对"扒窃"入刑认定的差异。笔者基于对扒窃惩处难这一由来已久的命题,就如何正确认识这一重要法律条文细节及恰当运用,深入思考并提出了自己的看法。

'Criminal Law Amendment(Eight)' from a legal perspective will put pick-pocketing into the ' sentence', effectively expanding the fight scope and intensity against theft. However, for the increased three kinds of theft cases of Article 39, namely, discrepancy understanding for the meaning of this intermediate comma of 'burglary, carrying weapons theft, pick-pocketing' caused by judicial practice ' Pick-pocketing' into the criminal finds differences. The author, based on the long hard pick-pocketing punishment proposition on how to correctly understand the details of this important law and proper use, deep thinking and put forward their own views.