伊东忠太《中国建筑史》评述——兼与梁思成、林徽因的早期中国建筑史研究比较

长期以来,中国建筑史界对于日本学者伊东忠太的早期学术贡献缺乏系统研究,导致对以梁思成、林徽因为代表的中国营造学社所进行的中国建筑史研究缺乏一个可以参照、比较的学术背景。本文将对日本学者伊东忠太的《中国建筑史》著作进行系统地分析,探讨他提出的若干理论问题,并对其研究的特征进行总结,借此在一定程度上还原当时中国建筑史研究的国际学术背景。在此基础上,与梁思成、林徽因所进行的中国建筑史研究进行比较,试图从历史的视角重新评价他们的早期研究工作在该学科中的创新和突破。

Most of the Chinese scholars who studied on Chinese Architectural History paid no attention to Chuta Ito's contribution for a long time.Thai was the reason why we lost the clear academia when we were talking about Liang Sichcng and Lin Huiyin、composings.In ihis essay.I'm going to focus on Chuta Ito's work,discuss several(juestions on ancieChinese architecture which was mentioned by him and conclude the feature of his study.Then trys tocompare Ito's with Liang and Lin s Study on Chinese Architectural History,in order to find out the inn ovation of their study in the historical way.