合同法定形式效力比较及我国立法的完善

The Effect Comparison of Legal Contract Forms and the Legislative Improvement of Our Country

《合同法》在合同形式方面做出了许多与市场经济相适应的新规定 ,但由于对法定形式的法律性质和效力缺乏明确规定 ,引起法学理论和审判实践上的诸多不同理解和做法。借鉴国外的有关规定 ,补充规定“缺少法定书面形式的合同无效” ,修改第三十六条的“合同成立”为“合同有效” ,删除第四十四条关于批准、登记生效的规定 ,使我国合同形式的法律趋于完善成为必要。

Although the Contract Law on contract forms has complemented new stipulations in accordance with market economy, there is still devoid of definite stipulation of legal quality and validity of legal contract forms. Thus, it results in different interpretations and practice in theoretical jurisprudence and its practice. In the view of relevant regulations of other countries, it is necessary to make supplementary terms on 'valid contracts that lack legal written forms,' modify Article 36 with 'contract enters into force' instead of 'contract starts,' abolish Article 44 concerning the provisions of certification, registration and effectiveness. These help relative laws of contract forms perfect.