期刊文献+

抗震液化的总应力合成分析方法 被引量:4

Total Stress Synthesized Analysis Method for Liquefaction under Seismic Loadings
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于总应力动力分析法,运用二维显式有限差分程序FLAC对某大坝在地震荷载作用下的动力响应进行模拟分析。编制了分析大坝液化的数值模型的分析模块并与FLAC接口。分别考虑了水平、竖向地震荷载以及两个方向的耦合和不同水位深度对大坝动力特性的影响,得到了大坝在地震荷载作用下液化区域和位移矢量的分布态势。 There are two concerns for assessing liquefaction response: (1) Will liquefaction be triggered in significant zones? And if so, (2) what displacement will occur? Liquefaction can cause a large drop of strength, and damaging displacement may result if the liquefaction zones are of sufficient extent. These displacements can be predicted by two approaches: (1) empirical equations based on past experiences; and (2) mechanics-based methods. A mechanics-based approach is presented for assessing post-liquefaction displacements of slopes. The approach is derived from total stress procedures in current use, with two major advantages; (1) the triggering and post-liquefaction responses have been synthesized into one analysis, and (2) the modeling of the post-liquefaction clement behavior is greatly improved. Mechanics-based methods estimate the field response by approximating soil behavior using numerical models. The models capture the fundamental physics of dynamic soil response, although their success is limited by inherent simplifications. The accepted state of practice is often a three-phase total stress procedure :( Ⅰ )Triggering evaluation: Zones of liquefaction are predicted by comparing estimates of applied loading or cyclic shear stress to the anticipated resistance to liquefaction. The resistance to triggering is typically based on in-situ tests, such as the standard penetration test. (Ⅱ ) Flow slide evaluation; If significant zones of liquefaction are predicted, the potential for a flow slide is evaluated using limit equilibrium techniques. The susceptibil ity to large deformations is found by assigning residual or post-liquefaction strengths to the liquefied zones and appropriate undrained strengths to the material. If the safety factor is less than or near 1, the structure is not stable. ( Ⅲ) Displacement evaluation: large but limited displacement may occur even if the structure has sufficient strength to maintain overall stability. These limited displacements accumulate during an earthquake and are a direct result of the continuing inertia loading. Techniques for estimating th ese displacements are often based on Newmark method and model the displacing soil as a rigid block translating on a plane. The triggering of liquefaction is assessed by continuously evaluating predicted shear stress. When sufficient stress cycles have accumulated to trigger liquefaction at a location, then the element properties at that location are modified to reflect liquefaction behavior. Additional element liquefies as the shaking continues and the displacements increase with the duration of shaking. The dynamic responses on a dam under seismic loadings are simulated and analyzed by using the code FLAC which is two-dimensional explicit program according to this method. The code of the analysis model which is used to analyse liquefaction of a dam is programmed and interfaced with FLAC code. The dynamic characteristic of the dam caused by vertical, horizontal and two-dimension coupled seismic loadings and different depths of water are considered. The distributing states of displacement vector and liquefaction zones of the dam are gained.
出处 《防灾减灾工程学报》 CSCD 2003年第1期1-10,共10页 Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering
基金 国家教委留学回国人员基金资助
关键词 地震荷载 抗震液化 总应力合成法 FLAC程序 砂土 大坝 数值模拟 岩土分析 seismic loadings liquefaction total stress synthesized method FLAC code
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1[1]Youd, T.L., and Idriss, I.M. Summary Report of the 1996 NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance[M]. Salt Lake City, Utah, 1997.
  • 2[2]Beaty, M., Byrne, P.M. A Simulation of the Upper San Fernando dam usi ng a synthesized approach[A]. In Proceedings of the Second International Confe rence on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering[C]. Lisbon, Portugal. Balkema, in P ress.1999.537-546.
  • 3[3]Byrne, P.M. and Harder, L.F., jr. Terzaghi Dam, Review of Deficiency Investigation[J]. JGED, ASCE, 1983,109(3):458-482.
  • 4[4]Idriss I.M., Seed, H. B. Presentation Notes, Transportation Research Board Workshop on Recent Advances in Liquefaction Evaluations[C]. TRB Meeting, Washington, D.C.1997.
  • 5[5]Seed H.B., and Idriss I.M. Ground Motions and Soil Liquefaction Durin g Earthquakes[P]. Earthquake Engrg. Res. Institute, Berkeley, CA.1982.
  • 6[6]Seed, H.B. Earthquake Resistant Design of Earth Dams[C]. Symposium on Seismic Design of Earth Dams and Caverns, ASCE, New York. 1983.
  • 7[7]Vaid, Y.P., Chen, Jing C., and Tumi, Hadi Confining Pressure, Grain A ngularity, a Liquefaction[J]. JGED. ASCE. 1985. 1(3):357-362.
  • 8[8]Vaid, Y.P., and Thomas, J. Post Liquefaction Behaviour of Sand[C]. Proceedings of the 11th Int. Conf. On Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, New Delhi, India. 1994.

同被引文献55

  • 1王学滨,于海军,潘一山.考虑应变梯度效应的三点弯梁模型解析研究——第一部分:局部化带的传播[J].工程力学,2004,21(5):193-197. 被引量:2
  • 2国胜兵,高培正,潘越峰,王明洋,钱七虎.爆炸波在准饱和砂土中的传播规律[J].岩土力学,2004,25(12):1897-1902. 被引量:10
  • 3杨小礼,李亮.层状地基中交通隧道地震反应分析[J].长沙铁道学院学报,2000,18(4):15-19. 被引量:9
  • 4汪闻韶.饱和砂土振动孔隙水压力研究[J].水利学报,1962,(2):67-68.
  • 5郑颖人 沈珠江 龚晓南.岩土塑性力学原理[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2002..
  • 6Ulfkjaer J P, Krenk S, Brincker R. Analytical model for fictious crack propagation in concrete beams[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 1995, 121(1):7-15.
  • 7Sundara Raja Iyengar K T, Raviraj S. Analytical study of Fracture in concrete beams using blunt crack model[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 2001, 127(8): 828-834.
  • 8石桥.孔隙水压力上升机理与土的液化[A].见;地基与基础译文集(1)[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1979.
  • 9张建民,刘公社.动荷载下饱和无粘性±孔隙水压力计算模型的分析研究[A].见:第三届全国土动力学学术会议论文集[C].上海:同济大学出版社,1990.295—302.
  • 10Seed H B, Philippe D, Martin J L. Pressure changes during soil liquefaction[J].JGED, ASCE, 1976, 102(GT4): 323-346.

引证文献4

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部