期刊文献+

树脂加固结合纤维桩核修复对发育不全前磨牙牙根抗折性的影响 被引量:1

Fracture resistance in immature pre-molar root using resin reinforce and fiber post
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨使用树脂加固根管内壁及纤维桩体外修复发育不完全前磨牙牙根后的抗折性差异。方法 50颗离体人下颌第一或第二前磨牙,统一冠根长度,随机均分为5组,A组、B组分别为阴性和阳性对照组,C组用复合树脂加固根管内壁,D组用纤维桩加固,E组同时用复合树脂和纤维桩加固,每组牙分别经过不同的处理后,包埋于自凝塑料中并置于电子万能测试机上,测定其抗折强度,记录各颗牙的抗折力最大值,利用ANOVA(P=0.05)软件分析各组间的抗折性差异。结果 C组、D组、E组与A、B对照组之间两两存在显著性差异,D组与E组之间也存在显著性差异。结论无论使用树脂加固根管内壁还是纤维桩修复均能显著增强根尖发育不完全前磨牙牙根的抗折性,其中同时采用两种方法修复的牙齿抗折性最强。 Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference of fracture resistance in immature premolar by using resin reinforce the inwall of the root canal and fiber post core system in vitro.Methods 50 human mandibular premolars were divided into five groups randomly,and uniform length of crown and root.Group A and B were negative and positive control,Group C was applied resin reinforce the inwall of the root canal,Group D used fiber post, Group E was applied both resin and fiber post.Teeth in each group will dealed with different ways.All these 50 teeth were embedding into the self-curing acrylic resin,placed into the universal testing machine,tested fracture resistance of all the teeth,then recorded the maximum value of break-resistance force.Using ANOVA(P=0.05) to assess the differences among these different methods.Results The significant differences existed among the Group C,Group D,Group E and Group A、B(control group),and so was Group D and Group E.Conclusions Whether using the resin to reinforce the inwall of the root canal or the fiber post system could both enhance the fracture resistance of the immature premolar evidently,while the best outcome could be obtained if the two methods are used together.
出处 《口腔材料器械杂志》 2013年第1期13-16,27,共5页 Chinese Journal of Dental Materials and Devices
基金 上海市重点学科建没项目资助(S30206)
关键词 复合树脂 纤维桩 年轻恒牙 前磨牙牙根 抗折强度 Composite resin Fiber post Immature teeth Pre-molar root Fracture resistance
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Katebzadeh N,Dalton BC,Trope M.Strengthening immature teeth during and after apexification[].Journal of Endodontics.1998
  • 2Kerekes K,Heide S,Jacobsen I.Follow-up examination of endodontic treatment in traumatized juvenile incisors[].Journal of Endodontics.1980
  • 3Saupe WA,Gluskin AH,Radke RA Jr.A comparative study offracture resistance between orphologic dowel and cores and a res-in-reinforced dowel system in the intraradicular restoration ofstructurally compromised roots[].Quintessence International.1996
  • 4Farah JW,Powers JM.Non-metal posts[].Dent Adv.2003
  • 5Cvek M.Prognosis of luxated non-vital maxillary incisors treated with calcium hydroxide and filled with gutta percha.A retrospective clinical study[].Endodontics and Dental Traumatology.1992
  • 6Carvalho CA,Valera MC,Oliveira LD,et al.Structural resistance in immature teeth using root reinforcements in vitro[].Dental Traumatology.2005
  • 7Lui JL.Composite resin reinforcement of flared canals using light-transmitting plastic posts[].Quintessence International.1994
  • 8Akkayan B,Gulmez T.Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems[].Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry The.2002
  • 9Marchi G.M,Mitsui FH.Effect of remaining dentine structure and thermal-mechanical aging on the fracture resistance of bovine roots with different post and core systems[].International Endodontic Journal Volume.2008

共引文献2

同被引文献20

  • 1李伟,陈吉华,郑亚萍,王辉,王迎捷.新型齿科纤维/树脂桩钉的应用设计及性能研究[J].口腔医学研究,2004,20(6):623-625. 被引量:6
  • 2赵铱民.口腔修复学[M].第6版.北京:人民卫生出版社.89—96.
  • 3Akkayan B, Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems[J]. Prosthet Dent,2002,87 (4): 431-437.
  • 4Ottl P, Hahn L, Lauer HCH, et al. Fracture characteristics of car- bon fiber, ceramic and non - palladium endodontic post systems at monotonously increasing loads [J] .Oral Rehabil,2002,29(2): 175-182.
  • 5Carvalho RM, Yoshiyama M, Homer JA, et al. Bonding mecha- nism of Variglass to dentin [Jl .Am J Dent, 1995,8(5):253-258.
  • 6Goracci C, Raffaelli O, Monticelli F, et al. The adhesion between prefabricated FRC posts and composite resin cores: microtensile bond strength with and without post-silanization[J]. Dent Ma- ter,2005,21 (5):437-444.
  • 7Bouillaguet S, Troesch S, Wataha JC, et al. Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin [J] .DentMater, 2003,19(3):199-205.
  • 8Balbosh A, Ludwig K, Kern M. Comparison of titanium dowel retention using four different luting agents [J] .Prosthet Dent, 2005,9 (4) :227-233.
  • 9Saupe WA, Gluskin AH, Radke RA Jr. A comparative study of fracture resistance between morphologic dowel and cores and a resin-reinforced dowel system in the intraradicular restoration of structurally compromised roots [J] .Quintessence lnt,1996,27 (4) :483-491.
  • 10Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia- Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber- reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores [J]. Am J Dent,2000,13 (2) :158.

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部