期刊文献+

学术论文的Twitter和Mendeley指标的累积特征及规律探讨 被引量:4

Research on the Cumulation Characteristics and Laws of Twitter and Mendeley Collected in Research Article
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过对学术论文的推特(Twitter)和Mendeley的数据跟踪和分析,深入研究学术论文在网络媒体中的传播规律。跟踪记录了5种不同类型的期刊于2016年11-12月间发表的136篇学术论文的Twitter和Mendeley数据,数据收集截止到2017年12月中旬。重点探索两项指标的累积趋势和分布规律,计算两个时间节点的累积值与Scopus统计的引文次数之间的相关关系。结果显示,学术论文的Twitter和Mendeley累积值表现出一定程度的独立性,即论文不论是开放获取或非开放获取,无论出版机构是否性质相同,所发表的论文的Twitter和Mendeley这两项指标均可进行比较;两项指标不同时间节点的累积值具有一致性,并且具有早期预测功能,即可根据论文发表后其Twitter和Mendeley数据更快地发现和识别出高学术影响力论文。 Through the tracking and analysis of the Twitter and Mendeley data of the research article,this paper probes into the characteristics and laws of network dissemination of research article.The Twitter and Mendeley data of 136 research articles published in November 2016 issue on five different types of journals was tracked and recorded.The cumulative trends and distribution of the two indicators were explored;The correlation between two indicators data recorded at different stages and between two indicators data and citation data counted by Scopus were calculated.Twitter and Mendeley cumulative value of research article shows independence to a certain degree.This means that the articles,whether in form of open access and published by different publishers,can be compared by the two indicators.In addition.the distribution characteristics of the two indicators of different stages are consistent,which means that the two indicators have early prediction function that can used to identify high-impact research articles earlier.
作者 王真 马建华 Wang Zhen;Ma Jianhua(National Science Library,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing100190,China;Department of Library,Information and Archives Management,University of Chinese Academy ofSciences,Beijing100190,China)
出处 《科学观察》 2019年第4期35-44,共10页 Science Focus
关键词 研究论文 推特 Mendeley 累积特征 research article Twitter Mendeley characteristics of cumulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献36

  • 1Neylon C,Wu S.Article-level metrics and the evolution of scientific impact[J].PLoS Biology,2009,7(11): e1000242.
  • 2Priem J,Taraborelli D,Groth P,et al.Altmetrics:A manifesto[EB/OL].[2015-04-15].http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/.
  • 3Bornmann L.Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research?An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics[J].Journal of Informetrics,2014,8(4):895-903.
  • 4Adie E,Roe W.Altmetric:Enriching scholarly content with article level discussion and metrics[J].Learned Publishing,2013,26(1):11-17.
  • 5Roemer R C,Borchardt R.From bibliometrics to altmetrics: A changing scholarly landscape[J].College & Research Libraries News,2012,73(10):596-600.
  • 6Galligan F,Dyas-Correia S.Altmetrics: Rethinking the way we measure[J].Serials Review,2013,39(1):56-61.
  • 7Priem J,Piwowar H A,Hemminger B M.Altmetrics in the wild:Using social media to explore scholarly impact [EB/OL].[2015-05-21].http://altmetrics.org/altmetrics12/priem/.
  • 8Bornmann L.Validity of altmetrics data for measuring societal impact: A study using data from altmetric and F1000Prime[J].Journal of Informetrics,2014,8(4):935-950.
  • 9Torres-Salinas D,Cabezas-Clavijo A,Jimenez-Contreras E.Altmetrics:New indicators for scientific communication in Web 2.0[J].Comunicar,2013,21(41):53-60.
  • 10Costas R,Zahedi Z,Wouters P.The thematic orientation of publications mentioned on social media:Large-scale disciplinary comparison of social media metrics with citations[J].Aslib Journal of Information Management,2015,67(3):260-288.

共引文献29

同被引文献36

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部