大学生社会赞许和后果严重程度对反事实思维的影响

The Influence of College Students' Social Approval and Consequence Severity on Counterfactual Thinking

采用故事法范式,设置不同的社会赞许性情境,探讨社会赞许和后果严重程度对反事实思维的影响。研究表明,在低社会赞许情境中,个体表现出更多的反事实思维,而高社会赞许情境和无社会赞许情境中,个体表现出较少的反事实思维,且社会赞许倾向低的个体比社会赞许倾向高的表现出更多的反事实思维;在后悔的判断中,个体更倾向于将后果严重的情境判断为比后果一般的情境更后悔。

Using the story method paradigm, different social desirability scenarios are set up to explore the influence of social approval and the severity of the consequences on counterfactual thinking. Research shows that, in low social approval situations, individuals showed counterfactual thinking more, and the high social desirability context and non social desirability situations, individuals showed less counterfactual thinking, and social desirability tendency of individuals with a low high tendency to show more counterfactual thinking than social desirability; in regret the judge, individuals tend to be serious consequences for situational judgment than the consequences of the general situation more regret.