期刊文献+

股权集中度、经理人激励与技术创新选择 被引量:41

Ownership concentration,managerial compensation and technology innovation choices
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于委托代理理论及技术创新理论,探讨股权集中度对企业技术创新选择的影响。以182家制造企业及高新技术企业数据为样本,利用因子分析及结构方程模型对相关假设进行检验。结果表明:(1)经理人激励在股权集中度和技术创新之间具有中介效应;(2)股权集中度和经理人短期薪酬激励呈负相关,和经理人长期薪酬激励呈正相关;(3)短期薪酬激励不利于突变创新,长期薪酬激励有利于突变创新和渐进创新。 We analyze the impacts of ownership concentration on technological innovation based on the agency theory and innovation theories. By introducing managerial compensation as mediate variable,we construct the logical relationship of'ownership concentration-managerial compensation-technological innovation'. After testing our hypotheses utilizing data of 182 companies from Chinese manufacture and high-technology industries with EFA,CFA an SEM analyses,we find that managerial compensation mediate the relationship between ownership concentration and technological innovation; and ownership concentration is negativity related to managerial short-term compensation,but is positively related to managerial long-term compensation. Moreover,short-term compensation goes against radical innovation,but long-term compensation promotes both radical and incremental innovation.
出处 《科研管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第4期48-55,共8页 Science Research Management
基金 国家自然科学基金(71272138) 2013-2016 教育博士点基金(20110201110016) 2012-2014
关键词 股权集中度 突变创新 渐进创新 经理人激励 ownership concentration radical innovation incremental innovation managerial compensation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献61

  • 1刘晓敏,李垣,史会斌.治理机制对企业技术创新的影响路径研究[J].科学学研究,2005,23(5):697-702. 被引量:19
  • 2粟国敏.我国企业自主创新问题及对策研究[J].工业技术经济,2006,25(11):13-15. 被引量:9
  • 3张宗益,张湄.关于高新技术企业公司治理与R&D投资行为的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007,28(5):23-26. 被引量:85
  • 4杨建君,刘刃.外部董事数量与企业创新决策关系[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007,28(6):45-48. 被引量:12
  • 5Shaker A. Zahra, et al. Entrepreneurship in Medium-size Companies: Exploring the Effects of Ownership and Governance Systems[J]. Journal of Management, 2000, (26).
  • 6Alchian,A.A.,and Demsetz,H. Production Information Cost, and Economic Organization [J]. American Economic Review, 1972, (62).
  • 7Wright et al. Impact of Corporate Insider, Blockholder and Institutional Equity Ownership On Finn Risk Taking [J]. Academy of Management Journal,1996,(39).
  • 8Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. Theory of the Finn: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, (3).
  • 9Francis, J. and Smith, A. Agency Costs and Innovation: Some Empirical Evidence [J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1995, (19).
  • 10Hiroyuki Okamuro and Jian Xiong Zhang. Ownership Structure and R&D Investment of Japanese Start-up Finns [R]. Center for Economic Institutions Working Paper Series. Hitotsubashi University,2006.

同被引文献641

引证文献41

二级引证文献306

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部