期刊文献+

基于突变理论的科技评价方法初探 被引量:21

Primary study on evaluation method of science and technology based on Catastrophe Theory
原文传递
导出
摘要 探讨一种基于突变理论的针对颠覆性技术的科技评价方法。运用数学建模法即尖点型突变方程构建颠覆性技术的预测模型,其新颖之处是以创新发展为评价导向,在现有企业层次微观模型基础上提出国家层次宏观模型的变量方案。研究结果是以科技替代率为势函数行为变量、以科技评价引导的社会认可度和创新驱动发展力度为控制变量的新型预测模型。本文的结论是:如果以替代率为果、认可度和创新力为因的颠覆性技术演化过程具有如模型所示的量化关系,那么以创新驱动发展为导向的科技评价便对技术发展临界状态的调控具有重要作用。本文为科技评价和创新政策决策等领域研究者提供理论参考。 This paper explored an evaluation method of science and technology based on catastrophe theory. The research method of mathematical modeling was adopted and the cusp catastrophe function was used for building a forecasting model of disruptive technology. The new method was guided by innovation-led development and changed the existing company-level micro model into a national-level one by providing choices of variables. The result was that the new catastrophe model was composed of three variables: rate of technological replacement as behavioral parameter in potential function,degree of social acceptance and strength of innovation as control factors. The conclusion was that if the three key variables revealed the quantitative relations in evolution of technology in which replacement is seen as result while acceptance and innovation degrees as causes,then it can be affirmed that evaluation of science and technology guided by innovation-led development should be vital to management of critical state of disruptive technologies. The paper could be a theoretical reference to researchers in the field of evaluation of science and technology and innovation policy making.
出处 《科研管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2017年第S1期193-200,共8页 Science Research Management
基金 中国科协创新战略研究院资助项目“2049年的中国:科技与社会展望的理论方法研究”,编号:2016ys2-3,起止时间:2016.3.-12
关键词 科学技术与社会 创新政策 尖点突变 颠覆性技术 替代率 science technology and society innovation policy cusp catastrophe disruptive technology rate of replacement
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献25

  • 1隋红建,王刚.项目管理在R&D中应用的问题及对策[J].科学管理研究,2005,23(1):47-49. 被引量:15
  • 2孙为钢.项目管理理论内涵分析[J].航天工业管理,2005(6):9-12. 被引量:13
  • 3茚诗松 王静龙.数理统计[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1990..
  • 4日本内阁府,S&TAdministrationinJapan[EB/OL].[2014-06-15].http://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/english/about/administra-tion.html.
  • 5日本财务省.HighlightsoftheBudgetforFY2014,FY2013,FY2012,FY2011,FY2010[EB/OL].[2014-06-15].http://WWW.mof.go.jp/english/budget/budget/index.html.
  • 6日本财务省.平成26年度予算[EB/OL].[2014-06-15].http://www.roof.go.jv/budget/budger-workflow/budget/fy2014/index.htm.
  • 7全国老龄工作委员会办公室.日本人口老龄化速度加快[EB/OL].[2014-06-15].http://www.cncaprc.gov.cn/guoling/13782.jhtml.
  • 8日本内阁府.BasicPolicyforManagementofIMPACT(Provisional)[EB/OL].[2014-06-15].http://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/sentan/about-kakushin.html.
  • 9日本内阁府.IMPAC TProgram Manager Application Guideline[EB/OL].[2014-06-15].http://www8.cao.go.jp/estp/sen-tan/about.kakushin.html.
  • 10Zhi Q,Jun S,Peng R,et al.The evolution of China's National Energy RD&D Programs:The role of scien- tists in science and technology decision making[J].Ener- gy Policy,2013(61):1568-1585.

共引文献74

同被引文献387

引证文献21

二级引证文献141

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部