摘要
高校科研人员学术影响力综合评价在推动国家、高校和高校科研人员的整体综合全面发展中起着非常重要的作用。在科学2. 0时代下,有必要将传统计量指标和替代计量指标结合起来实现更为全面有效的评价应用。鉴于此,本文基于ResearchGate网站平台抓取以北京工业大学科研人员为例的高校科研人员在网络媒体上呈现的影响力指标数据,并结合传统的引文计量指标数据,在数据分析中采用定性和定量相结合的方法,采用主成分分析和天际线的方法构建指标体系和评价模型,通过指标赋权作出综合评价。为科研人员学术影响力综合评价提供新视角,提出新思路,对具体评价结果进行解析,为完善高校教师科研评价体制的相应对策做出了重要贡献。
There is a growing body of literature that recognizes the importance of academic influence comprehensive evaluation.Evidence suggests that academic influence comprehensive evaluation of university researchers is among the practically important factors for promoting the overall development of the nation,ensuring appropriate systems of universities and supporting for university researchers.Lack of rationality and comprehensiveness of scientific evaluation has existed as a major problem for many years.A considerable amount of literature has been published on Science Research Management.These studies explore in practice to figure out the development trend of comprehensive evaluation of academic influence energetically.In the scientific 2.0 era,it is one of the most widely indispensable way to demonstrate that data from several sources have identified the increased the traditional measurement indicators and Altmetrics indicators associated with achieving a more comprehensive and confirming the effectiveness of evaluation.Scholars have long debated the impact of academic influence on the creation and diffusion of Altmetrics indicators.The research to date has tended to focus on traditional measurement dimension rather than Altmetrics dimension.Recent developments in the field of the central issue have led to a renewed interest in Altmetrics.The study was conducted in the form of a survey,with data of the Beijing University of Technology researchers as an example being gathered via the Research Gate website emerged as a powerful platform for social and intellectual needs.In addition,the network media platform has been thought of as a key factor in the data of influence indicator of university researchers.A combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches was used in the data analysis.The approach to empirical research adopted for this study was one of classical comprehensive evaluation methods.The central thesis of this paper is that using principal component analysis method to build indicators system and evaluation model,the solution was then assayed for evaluation using empowerment act.This paper describes the design and implementation of constructing evaluation system and accurately implementing evaluation.Therefore,it makes a major contribution to put forward the corresponding countermeasures by analyzing the concrete evaluation results.This study provides new insight into improving the evaluation system of university teachers’scientific research.On the one hand,it proves the feasibility and necessity of using Research Gate as an academic social platform to evaluate the academic influence of university researchers.On the other hand,considering the particularity of the evaluation object and the diversity of evaluation dimensions,the platform provides basic data as the carrier to build an appropriate evaluation index system,and effectively deal with these indicators(correlation analysis,principal component analysis)as a measurement tool and empowerment.The evaluation results are explanatory and scientific,reflecting the level of academic competence and academic exchanges of the evaluation objects,and evaluating outstanding academic leaders and researchers with potential for development.Based on the academic exchange behavior on the website platform,scientific researchers produce corresponding Substitution Measurement Index data,which combines with the traditional academic influence evaluation dimension.It is helpful to comprehensively understand the research results and exchange cooperation of university scientific researchers,so as to evaluate their comprehensive academic influence.To grasp the academic influence of scientific researchers in macro level,promote academic exchanges and enhance academic ability in micro level,form a healthy and positive academic research atmosphere,and promote the steady development of scientific research undertakings.Under the environment of increasing promotion of Web 2.0 social media platform,aiming at the construction of evaluation system,the main conclusions are as follows:this paper provides valuable reference for the future application of alternative metrology to academic impact evaluation more fully,and proves that index fusion can achieve more ideal and objective evaluation results.In addition,the introduction of skyline algorithm also expands the idea for the rational use of information obtained from the network academic exchange platform.Comprehensive evaluation based on academic interactive media is imperative.Therefore,it is necessary to further encourage and stimulate scientific researchers to interact and share research results in academic media.On the one hand,it can promote more comprehensive and timely scientific exchanges and stimulate innovation,on the other hand,it can also provide data soil for scientific research managers to conduct comprehensive academic evaluation.This study systematically reviews the data for academic influence of university scientific researchers,aiming to provide the applicability and effectiveness of the evaluation model.Due to practical constraints such as particularity of the example,this paper cannot provide a comprehensive review of the overall situation of colleges and universities.
作者
王菲菲
刘家妤
贾晨冉
Wang Feifei;Liu Jiayu;Jia Chenran(Research Base of Beijing Modern Manufacturing Development,College of Economics and Management,Beijing University of Technology,Beijing 100124,China)
出处
《科研管理》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2019年第4期264-276,共13页
Science Research Management
基金
国家社科基金青年项目:"基于多维信息计量分析的学术影响力综合评价研究"(项目编号:15CTQ023
起止时间:2015.07-2018.08)