期刊文献+

多肿瘤标志物蛋白质芯片检测系统结合人工智能在肝癌诊断研究中的初步评价 被引量:11

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:初步探讨多肿瘤标志物蛋白质芯片和人工智能诊断系统对于肿瘤诊断的应用价值。方法:用多肿瘤标志物蛋白质芯片诊断系统测定和人工智能SVM(支持向量机)软件分析50例肝癌患者,50例乙型肝炎患者和/或肝硬化患者及50份正常对照人群血清的12种常见的肿瘤标志物(AFP,CEA,NSE,CA125,CA153,CA242,CA19.9,PSA,free-PSA,Ferritin,β-HCG nd HGH)。结果:50例肝癌患者血清有46例血清肿瘤标志物为阳性(阳性率为92%),50例乙型肝炎和/或肝硬化患者血清中18例血清肿瘤标志物为阳性(阳性率为36%),50份正常对照血清中有2例血清出现肿瘤标志物(阳性率为4%)。实验还发现在部分肝癌患者血清中NSE、HGH、PSA和free-PSA也升高。结合SVM软件分析:无正常人被判断为肝癌患者,16%(8人)炎症患者被判断为肝癌,而肝癌的正确判断率为88%(44人)。结论:多肿瘤标志物蛋白质芯片诊断系统结合人工智能软件分析系统,能提高肿瘤标志物诊断肿瘤的准确度。
出处 《中国医药导刊》 2003年第1期35-37,共3页 Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1郑怀竞.国内基因扩增技术的进展[J].中国医药导刊,2001,3(4):303-304. 被引量:10
  • 2[3]Sauerbrei W, Madjar H, Prompeler HJ. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors by logistic regression and classification tree using Doppler flow signals. Methods Inf Med, 1998;37:226 ~ 234
  • 3[4]Albert R, Muller JD, Kristen P, et al. New method of digital image analysis with prognostic significance for node - negative breast cancer. Cytometry, 1996;24:140 ~ 150
  • 4[5]Burke HB, Goodman PH, Rosen DB, et al. Artificial neural net works improve the accuracy of cancer survival prediction. Cancer, 1997; 79:857 ~ 862
  • 5[6]Bottace L, Drew PJ, Hartley JE, et al. Artificial neutral networks applied to outcome predictions for colorectal cancer patients in separate institutions.Lancer, 1997;350:469~472
  • 6[7]Naguib RNG, Robinson MC, Neal DE, et al. Neural network anal ysis of combines conventional and experimental prognostic markers in prostate cancer: A pilot study. Br J Cancer, 1998;78:246~250
  • 7[8]Jefferson MF, Pendleton N, Lucas SB, et al. Comparison of a ge netic algorithm neural network with logistic regression for predicting outcome after surgery for patients with non - small cell lung carcino ma. Cancer 1997;79:1338 ~ 1342
  • 8[9]Sedlaczek P, Frydecka I, Gabrys M, et al. Comparative analysis of CA125, tissue polypeptide specific antigen, and soluble inter leukin - 2receptor alpha levels in sera, cyst, and ascitic fluids from patients with ovarian carcinoma. Cancer, 2002;95(9): 1886 ~ 1893
  • 9[10]Schutter EM, Davelaar EM, Van Kamp GL, et al. The differential diagnostic potential of a panel of tumor markers (CA 125, CA 15 - 3, and CA 72 - 4 antigens) in patients with a pelvic mass. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2002; 187(2) :385 ~ 392
  • 10[11]Carpelan- Holmstron M, Louhimo J, Stenman UH, etal. CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 72 - 4 improve the diagnostic accuracy in gas trointestinal cancers. Anticancer Res. 2002 Jul - Aug; 22(4): 2311 ~ 2316

二级参考文献1

共引文献17

同被引文献108

引证文献11

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部