摘要
本文对赵维国《说部论稿》中《鲁迅的小说史研究与小说史研究体系的构建》等论文发表了评论,并作了补述和分析,其中叙介了施蛰存回应日本学者增田涉质疑《中国小说史略》有关"话本"的解释,认为鲁迅将"话本"定义为"说话的人的底本"并没有错,还谈及学术评论应从实际出发,不应从批评概念出发,应当重视考据文章的学术价值。
This paper comments on some articles in Mr Zhao Weiguo's book Manuscripts of Comments on Fiction and makes some analyses and supplementary statements. The author believes Luxun's definition of huaben as the original material for the speaker to rely on is correct and that academic review should start from real circumstance, not from critical concepts.
出处
《河南大学学报(社会科学版)》
2003年第1期143-145,共3页
Journal of Henan University(Social Sciences)