期刊文献+

Assessing Sustainability of Land Management Using a Risk Identification Model 被引量:9

Assessing Sustainability of Land Management Using a Risk Identification Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 New Zealand is highly dependent on its soil resource for continued agricultural production. To avoiddepleting this resource, there is a need to identify soils and associated land management practices wherethere is a risk of soil degradation. Environmental integrity and ecosystem services also need to be maintained.Accordingly, to ensure sustainable production, the on- and off-site environmental impacts of land managementneed to be identified and managed. We developed a structural vulnerability index for New Zealand soils. Thisindex ranks soils according to their inherent susceptibility to physical degradation when used for agricultural(pasture, forestry and cropping) purposes. We also developed a rule-based model to assess soil compactionvulnerability by characterising the combined effects of resistance and resilience. Other soil attributes havebeen appraised using seven chemical, physical and biological indicators of soil quality. These indicators havebeen applied in a nation-wide project involving data collection from over 500 sites for a range of land uses.These soil quality data can be interpreted via the World Wide Web - through the interactive decision-support tool SINDI. The land-use impact model is a framework to assess agricultural land management andenvironmental sustainability, and may be applied to land units at any scale. Using land resource data andinformation the model explicitly identifies hazards to land productivity and environmental integrity. It utilisesqualitative expert and local knowledge and quantitative model-based evaluations to assess the potentialenvironmental impacts of land-management practices. The model is linked to a geographic informationsystem (GIS), allowing model outputs, such as the environmental impacts of site-specific best managementpractices, to be identified in a spatially explicit manner. The model has been tested in New Zealand in anarea of pastoral land use. Advantages of this risk identification model include: utilising current knowledge ofthe causes and effects of land-management practices on soil degradation; linking land management practiceto both on- and off-site environmental consequences; identifying important gaps in local knowledge; andproviding spatially explicit information on the environmental impact of land-management practices. New Zealand is highly dependent on its soil resource for continuedagricultural production. To avoid depleting this resource, there is a need to identify soils andassociated land management practices where there is a risk of soil degradation. Environmentalintegrity and ecosystem services also need to be maintained. Accordingly, to ensure sustainableproduction, the on- and off-site environmental impacts of land management need to be identified andmanaged. We developed a structural vulnerability index for New Zealand soils. This index ranks soilsaccording to their inherent susceptibility to physical degradation when used for agricultural(pasture, forestry and cropping) purposes. We also developed a rule-based model to assess soilcompaction vulnerability by characterising the combined effects of resistance and resilience. Othersoil attributes have been appraised using seven chemical, physical and biological indicators of soilquality. These indicators have been applied in a nation-wide project involving data collection fromover 500 sites for a range of land uses. These soil quality data can be interpreted via the WorldWide Web ― through the interactive decision-support tool SINDI. The land-use impact model is aframework to assess agricultural land management and environmental sustainability, and may beapplied to land units at any scale. Using land resource data and information the model explicitlyidentifies hazards to land productivity and environmental integrity. It utilises qualitative expertand local knowledge and quantitative model-based evaluations to assess the potential environmentalimpacts of land-management practices. The model is linked to a geographic information system (GIS),allowing model outputs, such as the environmental impacts of site-specific best managementpractices, to be identified in a spatially explicit manner. The model has been tested in New Zealandin an area of pastoral land use. Advantages of this risk identification model include: utilisingcurrent knowledge of the causes and effects of land-management practices on soil degradation;linking land management practice to both on- and off-site environmental consequences; identifyingimportant gaps in local knowledge; and providing spatially explicit information on the environmentalimpact of land-management practices.
出处 《Pedosphere》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2003年第1期41-48,共8页 土壤圈(英文版)
基金 Project supported by the Foundation for Science,Research and Technology,New Zealand(Contract CO9X0016) by the New Zealand Ministry for the Environment Sustainable Management Fund(Contract 5089) and by the following Regional Councils of New Zealand:
关键词 land-use planning soil quality RESILIENCE RESISTANCE sustainableagriculture 土地利用 土壤质量 持续农业 土地管理 土地规划 新西兰 土地资源
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Barringer, J. R. F., Wilde, R. H., Willoughby, E. J., Burgham, S., Hewitt, A. E., Gibb, R. G., Newsome, P. F. N. and Rijkse, W. 1998. Restructuring the New Zealand Land Resource Inventory to meet changing needs for spatial information in environmental research and management. In Proceedings of SIRC 98 Conference. Dunedin, New Zealand. pp. 25~33.
  • 2Doran, J. W. and Parkin, T. B. 1994. Defining and assessing soil quality. In Doran, J. W., Coleman, D.C., Bezdicek, D. F. and Stewart, B. A. (eds.) Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment. Soil Science Society of America Inc., Madison, USA. pp. 3~21.
  • 3Doran, J. W. and Parkin, T. B. 1996. Quantitative indicators of soil quality: A minimum dataset. In Doran J. W. and Jones, A. J. (eds.) Methods for Assessing Soil Quality. Soil Science Society of America Inc.,Madison, USA. pp. 25~37.
  • 4Eyles, G. O. 1992. The New Zealand Land Use Capability System techniques and applications. In Hamilton, G. J., Howes, K. M. and Attwater, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th Australian Soil Conservation Conference. Vol. 2. Land Capability Assessment Workshop. pp. 76~89.
  • 5FAO. 1976. A Framework for Land Evaluation. FAO Soils Bulletin No. 32. FAO, Rome. 72 pp.
  • 6Hair, J. F., Andersen, R. E., Tatham, R. L. and Black, W. C. 1995. Multivariate Data Analysis. 4th Edition. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, USA. 768 pp.
  • 7Harris, R. F. and Bezdicek, D. F. 1994. Descriptive aspects of soil quality/health. In Doran, J. W., Coleman, D. C., Bezdicek, D. F. and Stewart, B. A. (eds.) Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment. Soil Science Society of America Inc., Madison, USA. pp. 23~35.
  • 8Hewitt, A. E. and Shepherd, T. G. 1997. Structural vulnerability of New Zealand soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research. 35: 461~474.
  • 9Hewitt, A. E., Gibb, R. G. and Brown, I. 2002. Application of the land use impacts model to support land use planning, the consent process and environmental monitoring. In Stephens, P. R., Callaghan, J. and Austin, A.C. (eds.) Proceedings Soil Quality and Sustainable Land Management Conference, April 3~5, 2002, Landcare Research, Palmerston North, New Zealand. pp. 127~130.
  • 10Larson, W. E. and Pierce, F. J. 1994. The dynamics of soil quality as a measure of sustainable management. In Doran, J. W., Coleman, D. C., Bezdicek, D. F. and Stewart, B. A. (eds.) Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment. Soil Science Society of America Inc., Madison, USA. pp. 37~51.

同被引文献102

引证文献9

二级引证文献111

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部