期刊文献+

脑梗死患者血脂水平与颈动脉粥样硬化CTA特征的相关性 被引量:36

Correlation Between Blood Lipid Level and CTA Characteristics of Carotid Atherosclerosis in Patients with Cerebral Infarction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨脑梗死患者血脂水平与颈动脉粥样硬化CT血管造影(CTA)特征的相关性。方法搜集117例血脂异常的脑梗死患者及同期116例血脂正常的脑梗死患者。利用256层螺旋CT对其分别进行颈动脉CTA检查,观察颈动脉粥样硬化、狭窄程度及斑块性质的情况。利用统计学卡方检验比较血脂正常组和血脂异常组颈动脉粥样硬化发生率、粥样硬化斑块造成管腔的狭窄程度及粥样硬化斑块的性质的差异。同时根据血脂升高的程度进一步将血脂异常组分为血脂边缘性升高组与血脂升高组,利用统计学卡方检验比较两组颈动脉粥样硬化发生率、粥样硬化斑块造成管腔的狭窄程度及粥样硬化斑块性质的差异。结果血脂异常组颈动脉粥样硬化的发生率(χ~2=8.277,P=0.004)、颈动脉重度狭窄的发生率(χ~2=3.984,P=0.046)、颈动脉混合斑块(χ~2=8.650,P=0.003)及软斑块(χ~2=10.871,P=0.001)的发生率均高于血脂正常组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。血脂异常组与血脂正常组颈动脉轻中度狭窄的发生率(χ~2=0.002,P=0.964)无显著差异(P>0.05)。血脂异常组钙化斑块的发生率低于血脂正常组(χ~2=25.352,P=0.000),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。血脂边缘性升高组与血脂升高组在颈动脉粥样硬化的发生率(Fisher确切概率P=0.648)、轻中度狭窄的发生率(χ~2=0.109,P=0.741)、重度狭窄的发生率(χ~2=0.940,P=0.332)、钙化斑块的发生率(χ~2=0.285,P=0.593)、混合斑块的发生率(χ~2=0.006,P=0.937)及软斑块的发生率(χ~2=0.364,P=0.546)均无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论对于脑梗死患者,血脂发生边缘性升高时,其发生颈动脉粥样硬化、颈动脉中重度狭窄、混合斑块和软斑块的概率均高于血脂正常时,但与血脂升高时无差异。由此可见,当血脂发生边缘性升高时,即应当引起临床关注,积极控制血脂水平。 Objective To explore the relationship between the blood lipid level of patients with cerebral infarction and the CTA characteristics of carotid atherosclerotic plaque. Methods The author selected 117 cerebral infarction patients with dyslipidemia as a case group,and selected a control group,in the same period,including 116 cerebral infarction patients with the normal blood lipid. Using 256-slice spiral CT,patients were performed carotid artery angiography respectively and we observed the degree of carotid atherosclerosis and stenosis,as well as the nature of plaque.The author contrasted the ortholiposis group with the dyslipidemia group to analyze the discrepancy of the incidence rate of atherosclerosis,the narrow degree of lumen caused by atherosclerotic plaque and the nature of atherosclerotic plaque by chisquare test. Meanwhile,in line with the increased blood lipid,the dyslipidemia group was further divided into blood lipid marginal group and elevated blood lipid group by chisquare test. The difference mentioned above was analyzed through contrasting those two groups. Results The dyslipidemia group’s incidence rates of carotid atherosclerosis( χ~2= 8. 277,P = 0. 004),severe stenosis in carotid artery( χ~2= 3. 984,P = 0. 046),carotid artery mixed plaque( χ~2= 8. 650,P = 0. 003) and fatty plaques( χ~2= 10. 871,P = 0. 001) were higher than the ortholiposis group. This difference had statistical significance( P < 0. 05). Comparing the dyslipidemia group with ortholiposis group,there was no distinct difference( P > 0. 05) in the incidence rate of mild-moderate stenosis of carotid artery( χ~2= 0. 002,P = 0. 964). Additionally,the dyslipidemia group ’s incidence rate of calcified plaque( χ~2= 25. 352,P = 0. 000) was lower than the ortholiposis group’s. The difference between them also possessed statistical significance( P < 0. 05). Afterwards,comparing blood lipid marginal group with elevated blood lipid group,there were no distinct difference( P > 0. 05) in incidence rates of carotid atherosclerosis( Fisher Exact P = 0. 648),mild-moderate stenosis of carotid artery( χ~2= 0. 109,P = 0. 741),severe stenosis( χ~2= 0. 940,P = 0. 332),calcified plaque( χ~2=0. 285,P = 0. 593),mixed plaque( χ~2= 0. 006,P = 0. 937) and fatty plaque( χ~2= 0. 364,P = 0. 546). Conclusion In patients with cerebral infarction,the risk of carotid atherosclerosis,severe carotid stenosis,mixed plaque and soft plaque is higher than that of normal blood lipids,but there is no difference when blood lipids rise. It can be seen that when the level of blood lipids rises,it warrants clinical attention and blood lipid levels should be actively controlled.
作者 郭笑颜 陈伟彬 李盖 张惠英 GUO Xiaoyan;CHEN Weibin;LI Gai(CT Room,Affiliated Hospital of North China University of Science and Tenchnology,Tangshan,Hebei Province 063000,P.R.China)
出处 《临床放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2019年第2期214-218,共5页 Journal of Clinical Radiology
关键词 脑梗死 血脂水平 颈动脉粥样硬化 计算机断层扫描血管造影 Cerebral infarction Blood lipid level Carotid atherosclerosis Computed tomography angiography
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献250

共引文献5395

同被引文献325

引证文献36

二级引证文献173

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部