期刊文献+

双源CT准确评估冠状动脉钙化斑块所致狭窄的价值 被引量:11

The Value of Dual-Source CT to Accurately Assess the Stenosis of Coronary Artery Calcification Plaque
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨使用双源CT单能谱成像技术提高对冠状动脉钙化斑块所致狭窄程度评估的准确性。方法搜集80例至少一支冠状动脉钙化积分值大于100的患者,并随机分为A、B两组每组40例,其中A组使用回顾性心脏双能量模式扫描,重组单能谱值为100 ke V的图像;B组使用常规回顾性心脏螺旋扫描,重组100 ke V混合能量图像。记录CT容积剂量指数(CTDIvol)、剂量长度乘积(DLP)、有效辐射剂量(ED)。一周内均行冠状动脉造影(CAG)检查,以其为金标准。利用双盲法评估严重钙化节段的狭窄程度,根据金标准计算两组的诊断准确率、敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值(PV+)、阴性预测值(PV-)。利用Kappa检验评价两位观察者的评估一致性。对A组所有钙化严重节段每隔10 ke V重组一组图像,评估狭窄程度,并采用配对t检验与CAG结果比较,以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果 A组的诊断准确率、特异度和PV+均明显高于B组,敏感度和PV-与B组相差不大;A组的Kappa系数大于B组;A组的CTDIvol、DLP及ED与B组比较无明显统计学差异(P>0.05)。A组内能量级100 ke V的图像测得的狭窄程度与CAG比较误差最小(P>0.05)。结论采用冠状动脉CT双能量模式扫描,后处理时利用单能谱100 ke V重组可以有效减轻冠状动脉钙化斑块伪影,提高评估的客观性和准确性,并且没有明显增大辐射剂量。 Objective To investigate the accuracy of the assessment of stenosis caused by coronary artery calcification plaque using dual-source CT single-energy imaging.Methods Eighty patients with at least one coronary calcification score greater than 100 were randomly selected as the study subjects,and divided into two groups of 40 patients.Group A was retrospectively used to reconstruct single-energy spectral values.Images of 100 ke V;Group B reconstructed a 100 k V mixed energy image using a conventional retrospective cardiac spiral scan.CT volume dose index(CTDIvol),dose length product(DLP),effective dose(ED)was recorded.Coronary angiography(CAG)was performed within one week as the gold standard.The double-blind method was used to assess the degree of stenosis in severe calcification,and the diagnostic accuracy,sensitivity(Se),specificity(Sp),positive predictive value(PV+),and negative predictive value(PV-)of the two groups were calculated according to the gold standard..The Kappa test was used to evaluate the consistency of evaluation between the two observers.A group of images were reconstructed every 10 ke V in all severe calcified segments of group A.The degree of stenosis was evaluated and compared with CAG results by paired t-test.P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results The diagnostic accuracy,Sp and PV+of group A were significantly higher than those of group B.Se and PV-were not much different from group B.Kappa coefficient of group A was higher than group B.CTDIvol,DLP and ED of group A were compared with group B.There was no significant statistical difference(P>0.05).The stenosis measured by the image of energy level 100 ke V in group A was the smallest compared with CAG(P>0.05).Conclusion Coronary CT dual energy mode scanning is used.The single-energy spectrum 100 ke V reconstruction can effectively reduce the coronary calcification plaque artifacts,improve the objectivity and accuracy of the evaluation,and does not significantly increase the radiation dose.
作者 王栋 吴发银 史恒峰 蔡礼彬 陈龙 余洋 WANG Dong;WU Fayin;SHI Henfeng(CT Room,Anqing Municipal Hospital,Anqing 246000,P.R.China)
出处 《临床放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2019年第6期1028-1032,共5页 Journal of Clinical Radiology
关键词 双源CT 单能谱技术 冠状动脉钙化 冠状动脉狭窄 Dual-source CT Monoenergetic technology Coronary artery calcification Coronary stenosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献77

  • 1吕滨,庄囡,戴汝平,蒋世良.电子束CT冠状动脉钙化积分和血管造影诊断冠心病的价值[J].中华放射学杂志,2004,38(12):1305-1310. 被引量:11
  • 2张兆琪,马晓海.64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像——无创性冠状动脉检查的新纪元[J].中华放射学杂志,2006,40(8):789-791. 被引量:88
  • 3刘新,李颖,杨立,赵锡海,王新疆,赵绍宏,张玉霄,蔡祖龙.64层螺旋CT评价冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的价值[J].中华放射学杂志,2006,40(8):808-811. 被引量:44
  • 4杨立,赵林芬,李颖,王新疆,赵锡海,赵绍宏,赵红,吴坚,刘新,蔡祖龙.心肌桥和壁冠状动脉的多层螺旋CT诊断及其临床意义[J].中华医学杂志,2006,86(40):2858-2862. 被引量:86
  • 5朱巧洪,曾庆思,孙翀鹏,林翰菲,岑人丽,张超亮,刘莉.服用硝酸甘油对多层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像的影响[J].中华放射学杂志,2007,41(8):809-812. 被引量:24
  • 6Mark DB, Berman DS, Budoff MJ, et al. ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/ SCAI/SCCT 2010 expert consensus document on coronarv computed tomograph- ic angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents [J]. Circulation,2010,121 (22) :2509- 2543.
  • 7Mark DB, Bemmn DS, Budoff M]. ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/SCAI/ SCCT 2010 expert consensus document on coronary computed tomographic angi- ography : a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2010,55(23) :2663-.
  • 8Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, et al. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/ NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomo- graphy and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American Col-lege of Cardiology. Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropri- ateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Car- diovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Reso- nance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and .Society of lnterventional Radiology [ J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2006,48 ( 7 ) : 1475- 14-97.
  • 9Greenland P, Bonow RO, Brundage BH, et al. ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical ex- pert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomo- graphy in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain : a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography ) [J]. Circulation,2007,115(3) :402-426.
  • 10Stein PD, Yaekoub AY, Matta F, et al. 64-slice CT for diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review [J]. Am J Med,2008,121(8) :715-725.

共引文献296

同被引文献121

引证文献11

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部