期刊文献+

多靶位荧光原位杂交技术对上尿路尿路上皮癌诊断的应用价值 被引量:2

Application value of multi-target fluorescence in situ hybridization in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较多靶位荧光原位杂交技术(M-FISH)、尿脱落细胞学对上尿路尿路上皮细胞癌(UTUC诊断的临床研究。方法:30例正常健康人通过FISH检测3、7、l7号染色体非整倍性及9号染色体p16位点缺失等变异情况,确立阈值。同时收集101例影像学初步怀疑UTUC患者的尿液标本,行FISH检测和尿脱落细胞学检查,以手术病理结果为金标准,比较FISH、尿脱落细胞学检查对UTUC诊断的敏感度及特异度。结果:FISH、尿脱落细胞学检查对UTUC诊断的敏感度分别为78.9%(71/90)和38.9%(35/90),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);特异度为90.9%(10/11)和90.9%(10/11),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:与尿脱落细胞学检查相比,FISH对UTUC诊断有更高的敏感度和相似的特异度,是对UTUC进行早期无创伤性诊断的有效手段。 Objective:To compare between multi-target fluorescence in situ hybridization(FISH)and urinary cytology on the diagnosis of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma(UTUC).Method:Thirty healthy people were detected by FISH to detect the variation of chromosome 3,7 and 17 aneuploidy and the deletion of p16 site on chromosome 9.At the same time,urine samples from 101 patients with UTUC initially suspected by imaging were collected.FISH and urine cytology were performed at the same time.The pathological results were taken as the gold standard.The sensitivity and specificity between FISH and urine cytology to UTUC were compared.Result:The sensitivity of FISH and urine cytology to the diagnosis of UTUC were 78.9%(71/90)and 38.9%(35/90)respectively,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The specificity were 90.9%(10/11)and 90.9%(10/11)respectively,and the difference was not statistically significant(P >0.05).Conclusion:Compared with urinary cytology,FISH has higher sensitivity and similar specificity for the diagnosis of UTUC,so it's an effective method for early diagnosis of UTUC.
作者 沈绍晨 郭莲 冯绍喜 黄华 余义 SHEN Shaochen;GUO Lian;FENG Shaoxi;HUANG Hua;YU Yi(Department of Urology,Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University,Nanchang,330006,China)
出处 《临床泌尿外科杂志》 2019年第3期215-217,共3页 Journal of Clinical Urology
基金 江西省卫生计生委科技计划项目(编号20175227)
关键词 上尿路尿路上皮癌 多靶位荧光原位杂交技术 尿脱落细胞学 upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma multi-target fluorescence in situ hybridization urinary cytology
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献21

  • 1全国肿瘤防治研究办公室,卫生部统计信息中心.中国试点县、市恶性肿瘤的发病与死亡[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2002,24-34.
  • 2MESSING E M,YOUNG T B,HUNT V B,et al.Comparison of bladder cancer outcome in men under-going hematuria home screening versus those withstandard clinical presentations[J].Urology,1995,45:387-396.
  • 3KONETY B R,JOYCE G F,WISE M.Bladder andupper tract urothelial cancer[J].J Urol,2007,177:1636-1645.
  • 4HONG Y M,LOUGHLIN K R.Economic impact oftumor markers in bladder cancer surveillance[J].U-rology,2008,71:131-135.
  • 5AMIRA N,MOURAH S,ROZET F,et al.Non-inva-sive molecular detection of bladder cancer recurrence[J].Int J Cancer,2002,101:293-297.
  • 6HALLING K C,KING W,SOKOLOVA I A,et al.Acomparison of cytology and fluorescence in situ hy-bridization for the detection of urothelial carcinoma[J].J Urol,2000,164:1768-1775.
  • 7ZHANG J,ZHENG S,GAO Y,et al.A partial allelo-typing of urothelial carcinoma of bladder in the Chi-nese[J].Carcinogenesis,2004,25:343-347.
  • 8SONG M J,LEE H M,KIM S H.Clinical usefulnessof fluorescence in situ hybridization for diagnosis andsurveillance of bladder cancer[J].Cancer Genet Cyto-genet,2010,198:144-150.
  • 9VOSS J S,KIPP B R,KRUEGER A K,et al.Changesin specimen preparation method may impact urine cy-tologic evaluation[J].Am J Clin Pathol,2008,130:428-433.
  • 10KIPP B R,HALLING K C,CAMPION M B,et al.Assessing the value of reflex fluorescence in situ hy-bridization testing in the diagnosis of bladder cancerwhen routine urine cytological examination is equivo-cal[J].J Urol,2008,179:1296-301.

共引文献8

同被引文献20

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部