期刊文献+

基于FERC模型的油品流淌火灾定量风险评估方法研究 被引量:5

Study on quantitative risk assessment method for spill fire of oil based on FERC model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了评价油品储运过程中的流淌火灾风险,提出1种基于FERC模型的油品流淌火灾定量风险评估方法。以某汽油管道为例,分析大孔泄漏、中孔泄漏、小孔泄漏3种模式下流淌火各参数的动态变化过程,计算管道周边不同位置处的个人风险值。研究结果表明:流淌火燃烧面积的最大值随泄漏速率的增加而增大,对于给定的算例条件,大孔泄漏情景下的最大燃烧半径较小孔泄漏增大了18.4倍;相较小孔泄漏,大孔泄漏下安全距离增大了6.7倍;在距离泄漏点100 m的位置,小孔泄漏、中孔泄漏和大孔泄漏条件下的辐射热流密度值分别为0.13,1.34,8.02 k W/m^2;距离泄漏点34 m处时,大孔泄漏已经占总个人风险的99%;在开展风险评价时,应着重分析大孔泄漏的情景。 In order to evaluate the risk of spill fire during the storage and transportation processes of oil,a quantitative risk assessment method for the spill fire of oil based on FERC model was proposed.Taking certain gasoline pipeline as an example,the dynamic change processes of each factor of spill fire under three modes including large hole leakage,medium hole leakage and small hole leakage were analyzed,and the values of individual risk at different positions around the pipeline were calculated.The results showed that the maximum burning area of spill fire increased with the increase of leakage rate,and the maximum burning radius under the scenario of large hole leakage increased by 18.4 times than that of small hole leakage.The flame height under the small hole leakage was steady at 8.16 m,while the flame height under the large and medium hole leakage was steady at 15.4 m.Compared with the small hole leakage,the safety distance under the large hole leakage increased by 6.7 times.The radiation heat flux under the small hole leakage,medium hole leakage and large hole leakage was0.13,1.34 and 8.02 k W/m^2 respectively at the position with 100 m distance away from the leakage point.The large hole leakage occupied 99%of total individual risk at the position with 34 m distance away from the leakage point.Therefore,the scenario of large hole leakage should be analyzed with emphasis when carrying out the risk assessment.
作者 李云涛 陈旭芳 帅健 LI Yuntao;CHEN Xufang;SHUAI Jian(College of Safety and Ocean Engineering,China University of Petroleum(Beijing),Beijing 102249,China)
出处 《中国安全生产科学技术》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第3期104-108,共5页 Journal of Safety Science and Technology
基金 国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC0809300) 国家自然科学基金项目(51806247)
关键词 流淌火 FERC模型 定量风险评估 个人风险 spill fire FERC model quantitative risk assessment individual risk
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献29

  • 1SY/T5918-1994,埋地钢质管道沥青防腐层大修理技术规定[S],1994.
  • 2SY/T0017-2006,埋地钢质管道直流排流保护技术标准[S].
  • 3GB/T50698-2011埋地钢质管道交流干扰防护技术标准[S].
  • 4Cozzani V, Gubinelli G, Antonioni G, et al. The assess- ment of risk caused by domino effect in quantitative area risk analysis [ J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2005, 127 : 14-30.
  • 5Pietersen C M. Analysis of the LPG disaster in Mexico City [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1988, 20:85-107.
  • 6国家安全监督管理总局.中石油吉林石化分公司双苯厂“11.13”爆炸事故及松花江水污染事件调查爆炸[R].北京:国家安全监督管理总局,2006.
  • 7G|edhill J, Lines I. Development for methods to assess the significance of domino effects from major hazard sites [ M]. London: Health and Safety Executive, 1998:2-5.
  • 8CCPS. Guidelines for chemical process quantitative risk analysis [ M ]. 2^nd ed. New York: American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2000:7-19.
  • 9ACMH. Advisory committee on major hazards, Third re- port[ R]. London: Health & Safety Commission, 1984.
  • 10Khan F I, Abbasi S A. Domieffect: User-friendly soft- ware for domino effect analysis [ J]. Environmental Mod- el & Software, 1998,13(2) :163-177.

共引文献47

同被引文献52

引证文献5

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部