摘要
将 6 0例门诊房颤病人随机分为房颤复律汤治疗组 33例 ,抗心律失常化学药物为对照组 2 7例 ,进行临床比较观察。结果治疗组显效 2 6例 ,有效 4例 ,无效 3例 ,有效率为 90 .91% ,无毒副反应。对照组显效 4例 ,有效 5例 ,无效 18例 ,有效率为33.33% ,毒副反应 2 3例 (85 .19% )。两组有效率比较 ,差异有非常显著性 (P <0 .0 1)。
Of the 60 outpatients with auricular fibrillation, 33 patients were randomly included in the treatment group treated with the decoction, and the rest 27 patients in the control group treated with anti arrhythmia chemical drugs for comparison. In the former group 26 patients were found with marked effect, 4 effective, 3 non effective, with an effective rate of 90.91%, and no toxic or side effect was found. The corresponding figures in the latter group are respectively 4, 5, 18, 33.33%, and 23 patients were found with toxic or side effect (85.19%). Therefore marked difference exists when the two groups were compared ( P <0.01).
出处
《河南中医》
2003年第3期13-14,共2页
Henan Traditional Chinese Medicine
关键词
心房颤动
房颤复律汤
临床观察
中医药疗法
auricular fibrillation
Decoction for Restoration from Auricular Fibrillation
clinical observation