期刊文献+

静态顶空/顶空固相微萃取-气相色谱-质谱法检测食品用塑料包装材料中挥发性有机化合物残留量的适用性研究 被引量:11

Comparative Study on Feasibility of Static Head-Space/Head-Space-Solid Phase Micro-extraction-GC-MS Detection of Residual Amounts of Volatile Organic Compounds in Plastic Packagings for Food
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对两种采样方法——静态顶空法(SHS)和顶空固相微萃取法(HS-SPME)-用于气相色谱-质谱法(GC-MS)检测食品用塑料包装材料中15种挥发性有机化合物(VOC′s)残留量的适用性作了比较研究。SHS中选用的提取温度和时间依次为100℃和20 min。HS-SPME中用50/30μm DVB/CAR/PDMS萃取头,在室温萃取20min。结果表明:用HS-SPME采集挥发物时,测定结果的灵敏度远高于SHS,虽然采用两种方法所得测定值的RSD值相比较,SHS优于HSSPME,但考虑到食品用塑料包装材料中VOC′s的阈值很低,用HS-SPME与GC-MS相结合更适当。 A comparative study on the feasibility of 2sampling methods,i.e.,static head space(SHS)method and head-space-solid phase microextraction(HS-SPME)method used in combination with GC-MS analysis of plastic packagings for food for the contents of residual amounts of 15volatile organic compounds(VOC′s)was made.The temperature and time of extraction used in sampling with SHS were 100 ℃ and 20min respectively,while micro-extractor of 50/30μm DVB/CAR/PDMS was used in HS-SPME and the extraction,was carried out at room temperature for 20min.It was found that the values of detection limits found by sampling with HS-SPME were much lower than that of SHS,but values of RSD′s(n=6)found by sampling with SHS as a whole showed better precision.Considering the fact that the threshold values of VOC′s in the plastic packagings are quite low,sampling with HS-SPME is preferred to be used in combination with GC-MS analysis.
出处 《理化检验(化学分册)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第6期725-729,共5页 Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis(Part B:Chemical Analysis)
基金 国家质量监督检验检疫总局科研项目(2011IK041) "双打"质检公益专项(2012104020)
关键词 静态顶空采样法 顶空固相微萃取采样法 食品用塑料包装材料 挥发性有机化合物 SHS method of sampling HS-SPME method of sampling Plastic packagings for food Volatile organic compounds
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献123

共引文献203

同被引文献170

引证文献11

二级引证文献72

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部