康德的形而上学批判与马克思的哲学革命——基于一种前提性的规定视角

Kant' s Critique of Metaphysics and Marx' s Revolution——Based on a Formulary Perspective of a Premise

康德在对传统的一般形而上学进行批判时,划定了人类理性的认识范围,人们超出这种规定性所认识到的形而上学的对象是"诡辩的假科学";马克思的哲学革命为人们研究和批判的对象划定了界限,即以人的实践为前提的人类自然,若跨越这一界限去探寻在人之外的纯粹自然,则会陷入形而上学的困境。但是康德的形而上学批判与马克思的哲学革命又有所不同,康德是以不可知论和二元论为出发点以建立新的道德形而上学为归宿,而马克思则要抛弃任何先验的和超验的形而上学,可见,马克思对康德的超越之处。

When Kant criticize the traditional metaphysics, he limited the human rational knowledge scope, as people are outside theprovisions of the object to recognize metaphysics is ' sophistry pseudo science', Marx' s philosophical revolution limited the bound of the objects of Human research and critique which is the human nature with a premise of human practice.If we cross the bound to research the pure nature outside human, we will fall into the dilemma of metaphysics.However Kant' s philosophy revolution critique of metaphysics and Marx' s are different.Kant seted out with agnostic and dualism to establish a new metaphysics; Marx would like put away any form of transcental metaphysics.So we can know Marx is more improved than Kant.