期刊文献+

中外民事答辩制度之比较 被引量:6

A Comparative Study of Civil Pleading Process Between China and Foreign States
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章以对比方法粗略考察和评价了西方主要国家的民事答辩制度,分析了中国民事答辩制度的运行现状及其引发的诸多弊端,在民事诉讼的程序公正和诉讼效益之目标指引下,为中国民事答辩制度的完善提出了几点思路。 The author makes a comparative study of pleading process in the civil procedure between several main western states and analies the pleading process of Chinese civil action. The author thinks the provisionsof the pleading process of Chinese civil action are imperfect and less scientific, for it isn't treated as an independent stage in the preliminary action and the pleading process cannot help to make an efficient hearing. In the light of the requirements of due process and procedure efficiency, the author has theoretically discussed how to improve the Chinese civil procedural legislation.
作者 蔡国芹 黄宣
出处 《嘉应大学学报》 2003年第1期14-19,共6页 Journal of Jiaying University
关键词 民事诉讼 民事答辩制度 比较 civil procedure pleading process comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1[2][德]狄特@克罗林庚.德国民事诉讼法律与实务(刘汉富译)[M].北京;法律出版社,2000.

同被引文献20

引证文献6

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部